Abstract:Collusion among economic operators increases prices, reduces product quality, and hinders innovation. Structural links can affect the incentive and ability of firms to behave competitively by facilitating collusion. We use a network-based approach to study the relationship between ownership links and bidding behavior in procurement markets. We build temporal multiplex networks based on firms' ownership and co-bidding ties to find network measures that may signal collusion risk. We test four network measures, two at market-level (density and average harmonic closeness centrality) and two at firm-level (degree centrality and harmonic closeness centrality). Using data on public procurement contracts awarded in Sweden from 2010 to 2015, we found higher incidence of single bidding in markets that are more closely related through ownership links. Missing bidders are also more likely in these markets. Single bidding and missing bidders may indicate the presence of collusive arrangements such as of bid suppression or rotation. For the firm-level analyses, our results showed a positive relationship between winning probability and centrality in the ownership network. A similar result was obtained for cut-point position, indicating that firms that are more closely connected to other firms through ownership links have a more important position in the co-bidding network and are also more likely to win contracts.

Motivating collusion

How Can Downstream Firms Bene t from Upstream Collusion ?

On algorithmic collusion and reward-punishment schemes

When is Upstream Collusion Profitable?

The Effect of Local Tournament Incentives on Firms' Performance, Risk-Taking Decisions, and Financial Reporting Decisions

Incentive Compatible Collusion and Investment

RETRACTED: The influencing factors and governance strategies of corporate misconduct from the perspective of collusion

Upstream collusion and downstream managerial incentives

Collusion risk in corporate networks

Clawback enforcement, executive pay, and accounting manipulation

Stock Trading, Information Production, and Executive Incentives

Chief executive officer compensation, firm performance, and strategic coopetition: A seemingly unrelated regression approach

Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities

Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation

Relative Wealth Concerns, Executive Compensation, and Systemic Risk-Taking

Winning at Any Cost -- Infringing the Cartel Prohibition With Reinforcement Learning

The Market for Corporate Control and CEO Compensation: Complements or Substitutes?

Data‐driven collusion and competition in a pricing duopoly with multinomial logit demand

Common Ownership, Executive Compensation, and Product Market Competition

Does The Executive Pay Gap Lead To More Corporate Violations?

The impact of collusion on price behavior: Empirical results from two recent cases