The carbon footprint of different modes of birth in the UK and the Netherlands: An exploratory study using life cycle assessment

Nienke A. Spil,Kim E. van Nieuwenhuizen,Rachel Rowe,Jim G. Thornton,Elizabeth Murphy,Evelyn Verheijen,Clifford L. Shelton,Alexander E. P. Heazell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17771
2024-01-27
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Abstract:Objective To compare the carbon footprint of caesarean and vaginal birth. Design Life cycle assessment (LCA). Setting Tertiary maternity units and home births in the UK and the Netherlands. Population Birthing women. Methods A cradle‐to‐grave LCA using openLCA software to model the carbon footprint of different modes of delivery in the UK and the Netherlands. Main Outcome Measures 'Carbon footprint' (in kgCO2 equivalents [kgCO2e]). Results Excluding analgesia, the carbon footprint of a caesarean birth in the UK was 31.21 kgCO2e, compared with 12.47 kgCO2e for vaginal birth in hospital and 7.63 kgCO2e at home. In the Netherlands the carbon footprint of a caesarean was higher (32.96 kgCO2e), but lower for vaginal birth in hospital and home (10.74 and 6.27 kgCO2e, respectively). Emissions associated with analgesia for vaginal birth ranged from 0.08 kgCO2e (with opioid analgesia) to 237.33 kgCO2e (nitrous oxide with oxygen). Differences in analgesia use resulted in a lower average carbon footprint for vaginal birth in the Netherlands than the UK (11.64 versus 193.26 kgCO2e). Conclusion The carbon footprint of a caesarean is higher than for a vaginal birth if analgesia is excluded, but this is very sensitive to the analgesia used; use of nitrous oxide with oxygen multiplies the carbon footprint of vaginal birth 25‐fold. Alternative methods of pain relief or nitrous oxide destruction systems would lead to a substantial improvement in carbon footprint. Although clinical need and maternal choice are paramount, protocols should consider the environmental impact of different choices.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?