Abstract:Background: Patients with rare and complex diseases often experience delayed diagnoses and misdiagnoses because comprehensive knowledge about these diseases is limited to only a few medical experts. In this context, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful knowledge aggregation tools with applications in clinical decision support and education domains. Objective: This study aims to explore the potential of 3 popular LLMs, namely Bard (Google LLC), ChatGPT-3.5 (OpenAI), and GPT-4 (OpenAI), in medical education to enhance the diagnosis of rare and complex diseases while investigating the impact of prompt engineering on their performance. Methods: We conducted experiments on publicly available complex and rare cases to achieve these objectives. We implemented various prompt strategies to evaluate the performance of these models using both open-ended and multiple-choice prompts. In addition, we used a majority voting strategy to leverage diverse reasoning paths within language models, aiming to enhance their reliability. Furthermore, we compared their performance with the performance of human respondents and MedAlpaca, a generative LLM specifically designed for medical tasks. Results: Notably, all LLMs outperformed the average human consensus and MedAlpaca, with a minimum margin of 5% and 13%, respectively, across all 30 cases from the diagnostic case challenge collection. On the frequently misdiagnosed cases category, Bard tied with MedAlpaca but surpassed the human average consensus by 14%, whereas GPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 outperformed MedAlpaca and the human respondents on the moderately often misdiagnosed cases category with minimum accuracy scores of 28% and 11%, respectively. The majority voting strategy, particularly with GPT-4, demonstrated the highest overall score across all cases from the diagnostic complex case collection, surpassing that of other LLMs. On the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III data sets, Bard and GPT-4 achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy scores, with multiple-choice prompts scoring 93%, whereas ChatGPT-3.5 and MedAlpaca scored 73% and 47%, respectively. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that there is no one-size-fits-all prompting approach for improving the performance of LLMs and that a single strategy does not universally apply to all LLMs. Conclusions: Our findings shed light on the diagnostic capabilities of LLMs and the challenges associated with identifying an optimal prompting strategy that aligns with each language model's characteristics and specific task requirements. The significance of prompt engineering is highlighted, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners who use these language models for medical training. Furthermore, this study represents a crucial step toward understanding how LLMs can enhance diagnostic reasoning in rare and complex medical cases, paving the way for developing effective educational tools and accurate diagnostic aids to improve patient care and outcomes.

Accuracy, Consistency, and Hallucination of Large Language Models When Analyzing Unstructured Clinical Notes in Electronic Medical Records.

Use of Generative AI to Identify Helmet Status Among Patients With Micromobility-Related Injuries From Unstructured Clinical Notes

Critical Care Studies Using Large Language Models Based on Electronic Healthcare Records: A Technical Note

Enhancing Early Detection of Cognitive Decline in the Elderly: A Comparative Study Utilizing Large Language Models in Clinical Notes

A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation

Can Large Language Models Provide Emergency Medical Help Where There Is No Ambulance? A Comparative Study on Large Language Model Understanding of Emergency Medical Scenarios in Resource-Constrained Settings

Implications of Large Language Models for Quality and Efficiency of Neurologic Care: Emerging Issues in Neurology

A pilot feasibility study comparing large language models in extracting key information from ICU patient text records from an Irish population

Large Language Model Prompting Techniques for Advancement in Clinical Medicine

Large language models in solving clinical dilemmas - advantages and drawbacks

Evaluating Large Language Models in Extracting Cognitive Exam Dates and Scores

Evaluation of General Large Language Models in Contextually Assessing Semantic Concepts Extracted from Adult Critical Care Electronic Health Record Notes

Stochastic Parrots or ICU Experts? Large Language Models in Critical Care Medicine: A Scoping Review

A Survey of Clinicians’ Views of the Utility of Large Language Models

Evaluating Large Language Models for Drafting Emergency Department Discharge Summaries

Evaluating the accuracy of a state-of-the-art large language model for prediction of admissions from the emergency room

Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models

Unlocking the potential of advanced large language models in medication review and reconciliation: A proof-of-concept investigation

Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of RAG-enhanced vs. Human-Generated Medical Templates

Evaluating the use of large language models to provide clinical recommendations in the Emergency Department