Abstract:Public participation is an integral part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, as it provides opportunities for interested and affected parties (I&APs) to participate in the decision making process. This process is part of the legislative regime in South Africa and recognized as the main instrument to ensure that the proposed development is sustainable from a triple-helix perspective (i.e., ecological, socially, and economically sustainable). Therefore, the paper describes a case of public engagement in Xolobeni, located in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, as well as the environmental politics that evolved from arguments that favoured development over environmental conservation. The proposed mining project was known as the Xolobeni mining development project. The Department of Minerals and Petroleum Resources announced in 2005 that an Australian company, Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM), would establish a mining development project in Xolobeni to mine red sand dunes contained within five blocks, each named after the river that runs through it on its southern border. The Department of Minerals and Energy is the exclusive custodian of mining licences and thus the only Department that issues them, according to the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act (Act 28 of 2002). When seeking mining rights, it also requires corporations to consult with local populations. The Amadiba Crisis Committee filed a mining licence appeal based on a lack of consultation. One of the complications was also brought about by the divided community. TEM's solicitors sent a redacted copy of the mining right application to the community on 3 February 2016. The community was informed that drilling would begin on February 22nd, and that force would be employed if access was not granted. Following the receipt of the mining rights copy, an objection was lodged under section 10 of the MPRDA. The people resisted because they did not want their land, to be taken away. The community also opposed the proposed mining because they were concerned about the negative social, economic, and environmental effects. The land in Xolobeni was also used by the community for agriculture, or tourism and they did not want to lose that. The community also resists the migration of foreigners who wish to dwell in their village, fearing that they will overrun their way of life and impose a social lifestyle commonly connected with mining activity. The preceding study highlights the potential for conflict when communities reject the establishment of mining enterprises. As a result, the goal of this study is to see if incorporating community agreement into South Africa's legal requirements for granting a mining licence could help to reduce community unrest. The High Court ruled in favour of Xolobeni residents in this mining rights case

Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia

Coal mining and the resource community cycle: A longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Environmental Justice and Sustainability Impact Assessment: In Search of Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts Caused by Coal Mining in Inner Mongolia, China

The social impacts of mining on local communities in Australia

The devolution of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry

Revisiting procedural requirements for the assessment of environmental impacts arising from the different stages of deep seabed mining: Current practices at the International Seabed Authority and recommendations for improvement

Evaluating factors influencing community readiness for post-mining environmental development strategies

The state of public participation in the EIA process and its role in South Africa: a case of Xolobeni

Perceptions of local communities regarding the impacts of mining on employment and economic activities in South Africa

Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect

Synergies and challenges of bottom-up and top-down approaches for assessing social impacts in mining operation

Quantifying environmental impact of unplanned mining through integrated non-invasive geophysical methods: a case study from Jharia coalfield, India

Advancing socio-ecological considerations in impact assessment of extractive industries: A realist interview study in the Canadian context

Conservation after the fact: The prevalence of post-approval condition-setting in environmental impact assessment processes in Australia and its implications for achieving ecologically sustainable development outcomes

Environmental disclosure by Australian mining companies: environmental conscience or commercial reality?

Public Participation Modes in China's Environmental Impact Assessment Process: an Analytical Framework Based on Participation Extent and Conflict Level

Challenges in Including BCA in Planning Approval Processes: Coal Mine Projects in New South Wales, Australia

Can Social Impact Assessments (SIAs) be a sustainable strategy to address the skills development gap and community sustainability challenges in Just Energy Transition (JET) policy decision-making? Evidence from the South African mining communities of Kriel and Carolina in Mpumalanga

To Approve or not to Approve? A Comparative Analysis of State-Company-Indigenous Community Interactions in Mining in Canada and Sweden

Key steps in environmental impact assessment: a comparative study of China, Queensland State of Australia and Nepal