Red meat intake and the risk of endometrial cancer: Meta-analysis of observational studies

Woong Ju, NaNa Keum, Dong Hoon Lee, Yun Hwan Kim, Seung Cheol Kim, Eric L Ding, Eunyoung Cho
2015-04-26
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate whether red meat intake is related to the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) using meta-analysis.METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2013, using common keywords related to red meat and EC. Case-control studies and cohort studies comparing the risk of endometrial cancer among categories by the amount of intake were included. Eleven case-control studies and five cohort studies met our criteria. We performed a conventional and a dose-response meta-analysis of case-control studies using the DerSimonian-Laird method for random-effects. For cohort studies we performed a conventional meta-analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test.RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies including 5419 cases and 12654 controls, higher red meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of EC [summary relative risk (SRR)= 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15-1.79; I 2= 73.3% comparing extreme intake categories). In a dose-response analysis, for red meat intake of 100 g/d, SRR was 1.84 (95% CI: 1.64-2.05). In contrast, in the meta-analysis of five prospective studies including a total of 2549 cases among 247746 participants, no significant association between red meat intake and EC risk (SRR= 0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1.11; I 2= 4.9% comparing extreme intake categories) was observed.CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis found a significant linear association between red meat intake and EC risk based on case-control studies but this was not confirmed in prospective studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?