Abstract:Recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI), and particularly in deep learning (DL), have created tremendous excitement and opportunities in the earth and environmental sciences communities. To leverage these new 'data-driven' technologies, however, one needs to understand the fundamental concepts that give rise to DL and how they differ from 'process-based', mechanistic modelling. This paper revisits those fundamentals and addresses 10 questions often posed by earth and environmental scientists with the aid of a real-world modelling experiment. The overarching objective is to contribute to a future of AI-assisted earth and environmental sciences where DL models can (1) embrace the typically ignored knowledge base available, (2) function credibly in 'true' out-of-sample prediction, and (3) handle non-stationarity in earth and environmental systems. Comparing and contrasting earth and environmental problems with prominent AI applications, such as playing chess and trading in stock markets, provides critical insights for better directing future research in this field.Plain Language Summary.The recent unprecedented performance of deep learning (DL) in image and language processing has accelerated applications in non-native areas such as earth and environmental sciences where knowledge-driven, process-based modelling has dominated to date. A major challenge, however, is DL and process-based modelling are rooted in different worldviews towards problem solving. This paper explains the 'whats' and 'whys' of DL from first principles and how they are different from those of process-based modelling. A hydrologic modelling experiment is presented to illustrate the fundamental differences between the two worldviews, and to shed light on some critical, but often ignored, issues DL may face in practice. These issues largely arise from the fact that earth and environmental systems are complex, with behaviors that can change in ways that are physically explainable but not seen in the period of record, due to factors such as climate change and human interventions. Such issues must be addressed at the heart of the endeavor to extend DL techniques that embrace the knowledge base available, in anticipation of breakthroughs in an age of big data and computational power.

Synergizing Intuitive Physics and Big Data in Deep Learning: Can We Obtain Process Insights While Maintaining State‐Of‐The‐Art Hydrological Prediction Capability?

Improving AI System Awareness of Geoscience Knowledge: Symbiotic Integration of Physical Approaches and Deep Learning

Using Physics-Encoded GeoAI to Improve the Physical Realism of Deep Learning′s Rainfall-Runoff Responses under Climate Change

Distributed Hydrological Modeling With Physics‐Encoded Deep Learning: A General Framework and Its Application in the Amazon

Data Assimilation in Terrestrial Hydrology Based on Deep Learning Fusing Remote Sensing Big Data:Research Advances and Key Scientific Issues

Deep learning for water quality

A process-driven deep learning hydrological model for daily rainfall-runoff simulation

A trans-disciplinary review of deep learning research for water resources scientists

A Novel Deep Learning Approach for Data Assimilation of Complex Hydrological Systems

A Transdisciplinary Review of Deep Learning Research and Its Relevance for Water Resources Scientists

HESS Opinions: Deep Learning As a Promising Avenue Toward Knowledge Discovery in Water Sciences

Differentiable, learnable, regionalized process‐based models with multiphysical outputs can approach state‐of‐the‐art hydrologic prediction accuracy

Differentiable, learnable, regionalized process-based models with physical outputs can approach state-of-the-art hydrologic prediction accuracy

Deep Learning in Hydrology and Water Resources Disciplines: Concepts, Methods, Applications, and Research Directions

Can artificial intelligence and data-driven machine learning models match or even replace process-driven hydrologic models for streamflow simulation?: A case study of four watersheds with different hydro-climatic regions across the CONUS

Deep learning, explained: Fundamentals, explainability, and bridgeability to process-based modelling

Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)

Development of a Distributed Physics‐Informed Deep Learning Hydrological Model for Data‐Scarce Regions

Coupling Deep Learning and Physically Based Hydrological Models for Monthly Streamflow Predictions

From calibration to parameter learning: Harnessing the scaling effects of big data in geoscientific modeling

A Deep Learning Approach Based on Physical Constraints for Predicting Soil Moisture in Unsaturated Zones