The Translation, Culture-Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Among Chinese Older Population
Sisi Zhang,Miao Yu,Yu Zhang,Conying Liang,Dayi Hu,Dao Wen Wang,Xiaoping Meng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s450135
2024-02-17
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Sisi Zhang, 1 Miao Yu, 2 Yu Zhang, 2 Conying Liang, 2 Dayi Hu, 1 Dao Wen Wang, 1 Xiaoping Meng 2 1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130000, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Xiaoping Meng, Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, &num1473 Gongnong Road, Chaoyang District, Changchun, 130000, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale to the Chinese, and examine its reliability and validity among the older population. Methods: An approach comprising translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity examination in the Chinese version was conducted in two hospitals in Jilin, China. The t -tests were used to compare the sex differences between each item. Participants included Chinese individuals > 60 who were eligible for the cardiac rehabilitation program. Results: In total, 325 participants completed the questionnaire with an average age of 61.23 ± 9.68 years. The item-total correlations were 0.432 to 0.678. Factor analysis of CRBS-C (Kaiser Meyer Olkin = 0.867, Bartlett's test p = 0.000) revealed four factors: logistical factors, comorbidities/functional status, perceived need/healthcare factors, and work/time conflict. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a good model fit (χ 2/df = 1.84, RMSEA = 0.051, CFI = 0.953, TLI = 0.945, SRMR=0.046). Cronbach's alpha was 0.88 for the scale, ranging from 0.801 to 0.88 for each item, which indicates the internal reliability was acceptable. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the CRRS has acceptable reliability and validity in the Chinese elderly population. Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation, internal reliability, cross-cultural adaptation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of premature death and disability worldwide, especially in China. 1 With the economic and social development and population aging acceleration, the prevalence of CVD in China is increasing. In 2019, there were more than 330 million cases of CVD in China, and 2 out of every 5 deaths from it. 2 Meanwhile, as one of the world's fastest-aging countries, 254 million people in China are more than 60 years old, and this number is projected to reach 402 million by 2040. 3 Accounting for older adults (> 60 years) is expected to lead to higher rates of cardiovascular disease, mortality rate, and readmission rate. 4 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) as a multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach that could effectively reduce mortality of cardiac events, has been regarded as a Class Ia recommendation by the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 5,6 Despite the well-known benefits, CR utilization across the world is still low, ranging from 10% to 50%, especially for the older population. 7,8 Reasons for CR underuse are identified and involve factors at the patient, provider, and health system levels. 9 In an attempt to improve CR attendance and accessibility, a valid scale was necessary to address potential barriers to be mitigated among Chinese, especially for the older population. The Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS) was developed by Grace et al in Canada which assesses barriers to CR participation and enrolment from patient to health system level. 10 The final version consists of 21 items and was regarded as the most widely administered and comprehensive tool to assess CR barriers. 11,12 It was developed following a review of the literature, and revised with input from cardiologists, and CR staff. The original version of the CRBS consists of 21 items, which are composed of four subscales: logistical factors, comorbidities/functional status, perceived need/healthcare factors, and work/time conflict.10 Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale(1 -strongly disagree to 5 -strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater barriers to the CR program. To date, it has been translated into 14 languages, including Colombian-Spanish, French, Persian, Brazilian Portuguese, and Korean. Only one simplified Chinese version of CRBS has been published. In that study, most of the samples (95%) -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services