Autism spectrum disorder profiles in RASopathies: A systematic review

Edward Debbaut,Jean Steyaert,Mouna El Bakkali,Mouna El Bakkali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2428
2024-04-07
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Abstract:ASD symptom profiles in RASopathies were reviewed and compared. RASopathies show an unimodal, continuously distributed increase in ASD symptoms compared to the general population. Differences in the amount of ASD symptoms exist between RASopathies, but no specific symptom profile emerges. Effects of age, sex, cognition, ADHD, and genotype are discussed. Background RASopathies are associated with an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). For neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) there is ample evidence for this increased risk, while for other RASopathies this association has been studied less. No specific ASD profile has been delineated so far for RASopathies or a specific RASopathy individually. Methods We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether a specific RASopathy is associated with a specific ASD profile, or if RASopathies altogether have a distinct ASD profile compared to idiopathic ASD (iASD). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Open Grey for data about ASD features in RASopathies and potential modifiers. Results We included 41 articles on ASD features in NF1, Noonan syndrome (NS), Costello syndrome (CS), and cardio‐facio‐cutaneous syndrome (CFC). Individuals with NF1, NS, CS, and CFC on average have higher ASD symptomatology than healthy controls and unaffected siblings, though less than people with iASD. There is insufficient evidence for a distinct ASD phenotype in RASopathies compared to iASD or when RASopathies are compared with each other. We identified several potentially modifying factors of ASD symptoms in RASopathies. Conclusions Our systematic review found no convincing evidence for a specific ASD profile in RASopathies compared to iASD, or in a specific RASopathy compared to other RASopathies. However, we identified important limitations in the research literature which may also account for this result. These limitations are discussed and recommendations for future research are formulated.
genetics & heredity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?