Oncology and intensive care doctors' perception of intensive care admission of cancer patients: A cross-sectional national survey

Swarup Padhi,Prajwol Shrestha,Muhammad Alamgeer,Amanda Stevanovic,Deme Karikios,Arvind Rajamani,Ashwin Subramaniam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2023.12.005
IF: 3.265
2024-02-14
Australian Critical Care
Abstract:Introduction Prognosis in oncology has improved with early diagnosis and novel therapies. However, critical illness continues to trigger clinical and ethical dilemmas for the treating oncology and intensive care unit (ICU) doctors. Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions of oncology and ICU doctors in managing critically ill cancer patients. Methods A cross-sectional web-based survey exploring the management of a fictitious acutely deteriorating case vignette with solid-organ malignancy. The survey weblink was distributed between May and July 2022 to all Australian oncology and ICU doctors via newsletters to the members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, and the College of Intensive Care Medicine inviting them to participate. The weblink was active till August 2022. The six domains included patient prognostication, advanced care plan, collaborative management, legal/ethical/moral challenges, ICU referral, and protocol-based ICU admission. The outcomes were reported as the level of agreement between oncology and ICU doctors for each domain/question. Results 184 responses (64 oncology and 120 ICU doctors) were analysed. Most respondents were specialists (78.1% [ n = 50] oncology, 78.3% [n = 94] ICU doctors). Oncology doctors more commonly reported managing cancer patients with poor prognosis than ICU doctors ( p < 0.001). Oncology doctors less commonly referred such patients for ICU admission (29.7% [ n = 19] vs. 80.8% [ n = 97], p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR] = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03–0.16) and infrequently encountered patients with prior goals of care (GOC) in medical emergency team escalations (40.6% [ n = 26] vs. 86.7% [ n = 104]; p < 0.001; OR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02–0.15; p < 0.001). Oncology doctors were less likely to discuss GOC during medical emergency team calls or within 24 h of ICU admission. More oncology doctors than ICU doctors thought that training rotation in the corresponding speciality group was beneficial (56.3% [ n = 36] vs. 31.7% [ n = 38]; p = 0.012; OR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.02–4.23; p = 0.045). Conclusion Oncology doctors were less likely to encounter acute patient deterioration or establish timely GOC for such patients. Oncology doctors believed that an ICU rotation during their training may have helped manage challenging situations.
nursing,critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?