Housing Precarity in Six European and North American Cities: Threatened by the Loss of a Safe, Stable, and Affordable Home

Gabriela Debrunner,Katrin Hofer,Michael Wicki,Fiona Kauer,David Kaufmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2023.2291148

2024-01-12

Journal of the American Planning Association

Abstract:Problem, research strategy, and findings Increasing numbers of urban dwellers face housing precarity in cities worldwide. We conceptualize housing precarity as a multidimensional phenomenon, using five different dimensions: 1) housing affordability, 2) tenure security, 3) housing satisfaction, 4) neighborhood quality, and 5) community cohesion. By building on an original survey with 12,611 respondents from six cities (Berlin [Germany], Chicago [IL], London [United Kingdom], Los Angeles [CA], New York [NY], and Paris [France]), we examined how vulnerable residents—such as older residents, households with children, minorities, and renters—perceived the five dimensions of housing precarity compared with the rest of the population sample. We found first, that being a renter was negatively associated with all five dimensions of housing precarity, rendering renters more precarious than homeowners. Second, older residents did not seem to be more precarious than younger urban dwellers. Third, households with children and minorities had less tenure security and housing satisfaction than households without children or non-minorities. These results were largely robust across all cities. Further research is needed to analyze how local housing markets, planning and policy instruments, or land use conditions affect residents' perceived housing precarity outcomes.

urban studies,regional & urban planning

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the issue of housing insecurity in six cities across Europe and North America (Berlin, Chicago, London, Los Angeles, New York, and Paris). The authors define housing insecurity as a multidimensional phenomenon, encompassing five different aspects:

1. **Housing Affordability**: Whether residents can afford their housing costs.
2. **Tenure Security**: Residents' perception of residential stability and their control over when they must leave their homes.
3. **Housing Satisfaction**: The overall satisfaction of residents with their housing conditions.
4. **Community Quality**: Residents' evaluation of the physical environment quality of their community.
5. **Community Cohesion**: The level of social interaction and sense of belonging among residents within the community.

Through an original survey study involving 12,611 respondents, the authors analyzed the differences in these five dimensions among four vulnerable groups—renters, families with children, minority groups, and the elderly—compared to other population samples.

Key findings include:
- Renters exhibited higher levels of housing insecurity across all five dimensions.
- The elderly were not necessarily more prone to housing insecurity than younger residents.
- Families with children and minority groups had lower tenure security and housing satisfaction but perceived better community quality and cohesion.

These results were consistent across all six cities, indicating a need for further research on how local housing markets, planning policies, and land use conditions affect residents' experiences of housing insecurity. Additionally, the findings can inform urban planners, practitioners, and policymakers, helping them adopt resident-centered urban planning approaches and develop policies to support the housing stability and legal status of these vulnerable groups.