Abstract:Purpose: Patient-specific cutting guides are increasingly used in the field of osteotomies around the knee and can improve the accuracy of planned correction and more specifically in the case of double-level osteotomy (DLO). The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of postoperative coronal alignment after DLO using patient-specific cutting guides techniques (PSI) compared to conventional techniques. The secondary objective was to compare the functional results between the two groups at short-term follow-up. Hypothesis: The accuracy of global correction (HKA angle) is better with patient-specific cutting guides compared to conventional techniques for double-level osteotomy METHODS: This multicentric comparative retrospective study included 53 patients (mean age: 53.8 ± 5.2 years, male/female: 44/9) who underwent a DLO for knee varus malalignment. The coronal correction accuracy (as expressed by the difference between postoperative angular values and preoperative targeted correction) was compared between techniques using patient-specific cutting guides (PSI group, n = 27) or conventional techniques (n = 26) for the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). Postoperatively, the global alignment expressed by the hip-knee-ankle angle and the joint line obliquity were compared between groups. The postoperative functional results for KOOS and UCLA activity scale score were also compared at a mean follow-up of 1.7 years (1.0-3.1 years). Results: No difference was observed for the postoperative global alignment between the PSI and the conventional groups (Δ = 0.6 °, p = 0.11) neither for the postoperative posterior proximal tibial angle (Δ = 1.6°, p = 0,99) or the joint line obliquity (Δ = 0.3°, p = 0,17). In the coronal plane, the postoperative MPTA was lower in the PSI group (Δ = 2.3°, p < 0.001) as well as the postoperative LDFA (Δ = 0.9°, p = 0.01). Concerning correction accuracy in the coronal plane, the results showed a significant higher accuracy of the planned correction in the PSI group compared to the conventional group for MPTA (2.2 ± 0.2 versus 0.8 ± 0.7, Δ = 1.5 °, p < 0.001) and LDFA (1.3 ± 1.0 versus 0.6 ± 0.9, Δ = 0.7°, p < 0.001). No improvement difference was observed between the conventional group and the PSI group respectively for the KOOS symptoms (p = 0.12), the KOOS Pain (p = 0,57), the KOOS activities of daily living (p = 0.61), the KOOS sport/rec (p = 0.65), or for the KOOS Quality of Life (p = 0.99) neither for the UCLA (p = 0.97). Conclusions: This study suggests that the use of custom-made cutting guides improves the accuracy of planned correction in double-level osteotomy compared with conventional techniques, which may have implications particularly in centers not performing a large volume of osteotomies. This improved accuracy is not associated with any difference in joint line obliquity or functional results but these results need to be confirmed by a randomized prospective study. Level of evidence: III; Retrospective comparative study.

Preoperative Joint Line Convergence Angle as an Indicator of Clinical Outcomes and Accuracy of Alignment Correction After Double-Level Osteotomy

Preoperative joint line obliquity, a newly identified factor for overcorrection, can be incorporated into a novel preoperative planning method to optimise alignment in high tibial osteotomy

Analysis of Knee Joint Line Obliquity after High Tibial Osteotomy

Clinical relevance of joint line obliquity after high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis remains controversial: a systematic review

Postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures after medial open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy was improved by decreased joint line convergence angle

Double-level knee osteotomy accurately corrects lower limb deformity and provides satisfactory functional outcomes in bifocal (femur and tibia) valgus malaligned knees

Preoperative soft tissue laxity around knee was associated with less accurate alignment correction after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Double-Level Osteotomy Versus Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Bifocal Varus Deformity

Pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Surgical Technique and Preliminary Outcomes of Double-Level Osteotomy for Valgus Deformity

Double-level osteotomy for varus knees using patient-specific cutting guides allow more accurate correction but similar clinical outcomes as compared to conventional techniques

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus

Large multiplanar changes to native alignment have no apparent impact on clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

Adjusted planning based on the joint line convergence angle improves correction accuracy in the standing position after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

Effect of soft tissue laxity of the knee joint on limb alignment correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Better restoration of joint line obliquity in tibia first restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment TKA

Association of Undercorrection With Residual Proinflammatory Gene Expressions and Clinical Outcomes After Medial Open Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy

Development of a machine learning model for identifying the optimal situation favoring double-level osteotomy over single-level high tibial osteotomy

Effect of joint line orientation parameters on initial bone resection in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective clinicoradiological correlation study

Large angular correction of arithmetic coronal alignment is associated with residual lateral laxity after total knee arthroplasty in varus knees for Japanese patients

Joint line convergence angle is the most associated alignment factor with the severity of medial knee osteoarthritis