Abstract:The integration of single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell ATAC-sequencing (scATAC-seq) data offers a unique opportunity to gain a comprehensive view of cellular identity with defining features and to infer gene-regulatory relationships. Despite the emergence of technologies that simultaneously capture both the gene expression and chromatin accessibility of individual cells (paired data), the practical challenges of these approaches (e.g., the unavailability in previous samples and prohibitive cost) have led researchers to turn to the existing trove of single-modality data generated from independent biological samples (unpaired data). Various computational tools have been developed to integrate these unpaired single modality datasets. However, the comparative performance of these tools has not been comprehensively evaluated, and a standard benchmark pipeline is still lacking. To address these challenges, we used pseudo-unpaired scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq data derived from publicly available paired single-cell multi-omics datasets to benchmark 14 publicly available integration methods. The primary goal of unpaired single-cell multi-omics integration is to narrow the omics gap while preserving cell type diversity. We therefore focused on pair-wise cell distance and cluster performance in the joint latent space constructed by various integration tools in our benchmarking pipeline. To ensure the robustness of these computational approaches, we examined their stability across a variety of scenarios, including variations in cell number, cell types, and biological and technical batch effects. A number of the integration methods tested produced promising results. While the widely used Seurat package was recently reported to have the best performance (Lee et al., Genome Biology 2023), other computational tools such as scVI, Cobolt, scJoint, scglue and scBridge performed equally well or better in reducing omics differences and facilitating the identification of cell clusters. Notably, scglue and Cobolt demonstrated strong performance in aligning the same cell from different modalities, and discrete clusters emerged in the joint latent space using scJoint and scBridge. These findings suggest that it may not be strictly necessary to use paired multi-omics data to guide integration to achieve favorable results. Our freely available benchmarking pipeline will empower researchers to identify the optimal data integration methods for their specific data, facilitate the benchmarking of new methods, and contribute to future method development in the field. Citation Format: Jiani Chen, Wanzi Xiao, Eric Zhang, Xiang Chen. Benchmarking unpaired single-cell RNA and single-cell ATAC integration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular s); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl) nr 4943.

Imbalanced single-cell data integration leads to loss of biological information

Characterizing the impacts of dataset imbalance on single-cell data integration

Integration for single-cell RNA sequencing data based on the shared cell type assignment

Influence of single-cell RNA sequencing data integration on the performance of differential gene expression analysis

Signal recovery in single cell batch integration

Statistical Single Cell Multi-Omics Integration

Abstract 4943: Benchmarking unpaired single-cell RNA and single-cell ATAC integration

Population-level Integration of Single-Cell Datasets Enables Multi-Scale Analysis Across Samples

Unbiased integration of single cell multi-omics data

Evaluating Imputation Methods for Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

Integration of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Datasets: A Review of Computational Methods

Benchmarking algorithms for joint integration of unpaired and paired single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data

Recovery of biological signals lost in single-cell batch integration with CellANOVA

Benchmarking integration of single-cell differential expression

The effect of data transformation on low-dimensional integration of single-cell RNA-seq

Lost in space: what single-cell RNA sequencing cannot tell you

Is your data alignable? Principled and interpretable alignability testing and integration of single-cell data

Missing cell types in single-cell references impact deconvolution of bulk data but are detectable

Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species

Detecting cell-type-specific allelic expression imbalance by integrative analysis of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing data

BASiCS workflow: a step-by-step analysis of expression variability using single cell RNA sequencing data