Impulsivity profiles across five harmonized longitudinal childhood preventive interventions and associations with adult outcomes

Natalie Goulter,Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili,Ryoko Susukida,Joseph M. Kush,Jennifer Godwin,Katherine Masyn,Robert J. McMahon,J. Mark Eddy,Nicholas S. Ialongo,Patrick H. Tolan,Holly C. Wilcox,Rashelle J. Musci,Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579424000828
2024-04-26
Development and Psychopathology
Abstract:This study aimed to parse between-person heterogeneity in growth of impulsivity across childhood and adolescence among participants enrolled in five childhood preventive intervention trials targeting conduct problems. In addition, we aimed to test profile membership in relation to adult psychopathologies. Measurement items representing impulsive behavior across grades 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10, and aggression, substance use, suicidal ideation/attempts, and anxiety/depression in adulthood were integrated from the five trials (N = 4,975). We applied latent class growth analysis to this sample, as well as samples separated into nonintervention (n = 2,492) and intervention (n = 2,483) participants. Across all samples, profiles were characterized by high, moderate, low, and low-increasing impulsive levels. Regarding adult outcomes, in all samples, the high, moderate, and low profiles endorsed greater levels of aggression compared to the low-increasing profile. There were nuanced differences across samples and profiles on suicidal ideation/attempts and anxiety/depression. Across samples, there were no significant differences between profiles on substance use. Overall, our study helps to inform understanding of the developmental course and prognosis of impulsivity, as well as adding to collaborative efforts linking data across multiple studies to better inform understanding of developmental processes.
psychology, developmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?