Abstract:This paper describes a fundamental and empirically conspicuous problem inherent to surveys of human feelings and opinions in which subjective responses are elicited on numerical scales. The paper also proposes a solution. The problem is a tendency by some individuals — particularly those with low levels of education — to simplify the response scale by considering only a subset of possible responses such as the lowest, middle, and highest. In principle, this "focal value rounding" (FVR) behavior renders invalid even the weak ordinality assumption often used in analysis of such data. With "happiness" or life satisfaction data as an example, descriptive methods and a multinomial logit model both show that the effect is large and that education and, to a lesser extent, income level are predictors of FVR behavior. A model simultaneously accounting for the underlying wellbeing and for the degree of FVR is able to estimate the latent subjective wellbeing, i.e. the counterfactual full-scale responses for all respondents, the biases associated with traditional estimates, and the fraction of respondents who exhibit FVR. Addressing this problem helps to resolve a longstanding puzzle in the life satisfaction literature, namely that the returns to education, after adjusting for income, appear to be small or negative. Due to the same econometric problem, the marginal utility of income in a subjective wellbeing sense has been consistently underestimated.

On the Welfare Costs of Perceptions Biases

Perception of Fairness of Commercial Housing Price Increase Caused by Inflation

The social value of overreaction to information

The Rationality Bias

Ambiguity Aversion and Heterogeneity in Households’ Beliefs

Welfare costs of suboptimal retiree decisions

A social price to the rising cost of living? The bidirectional relationship between inflation and trust

Salience bias: A framework about the importance of prices and budget constraints perceptions

Consumption categories, household attention, and inflation expectations: Implications for optimal monetary policy

Deflation by Expenditure Components: A Harmless Adjustment?

The simple macroeconometrics of the quantity theory and the welfare cost of inflation

Liquidity Demand and Welfare in a Heterogeneous-Agent Economy

Visibility Bias in the Transmission of Consumption Beliefs and Undersaving

The econometrics of happiness: Are we underestimating the returns to education and income?

Inflation -- who cares? Monetary Policy in Times of Low Attention

Consumption dynamics and welfare under non-Gaussian earnings risk

Overestimation of social security payments reduces preferences for spending on social policy

Identity and inequality misperceptions, demographic determinants and efficacy of corrective measures

Money, Liquidity and Welfare

Equilibrium Asset Prices and Investor Behavior in the Presence of Money Illusion: A Preference-Based Formulation