Abstract:Private for-profit home care providers are key participants in European long-term care regimes. Yet, their policy preferences toward market making and market development remain under-researched. We present an analytical framework that identifies and explains those preferences. It outlines three key types of policies that shape home care markets: regulatory, financial and labour policies. We illustrate private providers' views on those policies by reference to Ireland's home care regime. Irish home care is a compelling case for this study. A major package of regulatory reforms is currently being introduced and private providers have outlined clear preferences about it. Our paper is based on interviews with 14 leading individuals involved in the home care sector. We find and explain how private providers wish to increase regulation over their activities; to split purchaser and provider roles; to reduce private forms of financing; and to expand the pool of labour available to them. We discuss how those preferences shed light on the political economic power dynamics that shape the Irish care regime. Our analytical framework may be applicable to other welfare markets at different stages of development and in other institutional contexts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Address
This paper aims to explore the policy preferences of private for-profit home care service providers in terms of market formation and market development. Specifically, the author identifies and explains these private providers' views and preferences regarding three key types of policies by analyzing the case of the Irish home care market:
1. **Regulatory Policies**: Including rules on market competition and quality regulation. For example, market entry thresholds, separation of roles between purchasers and providers, and prevention of "cream-skimming" behavior where low-cost clients are selected.
2. **Financial Policies**: Involving funding support for service demand and supply. For example, clients can receive vouchers or cash subsidies provided by the state, or the state can directly fund service providers.
3. **Labor Policies**: Involving labor supply and working conditions. For example, immigration policies, recruitment and training, remuneration, and job security.
### Research Background
The marketization reforms of the European long-term care market and their related policies (such as outsourcing, contracting out, and cash-for-care schemes) have been widely studied. However, there is relatively little research on the policy preferences of private for-profit home care service providers themselves. These providers now play a significant role in service delivery in many countries, but their policy preferences and interests remain unclear.
### Research Methods
The author collected the views and preferences of 14 individuals in leadership positions within the home care industry through interviews. These respondents mainly came from two major organizations in the Irish home care industry: Home & Community Care Ireland (HCCI) and Home Care Providers Alliance (HCPA).
### Main Findings
1. **Regulatory Policies**:
- Private providers believe that the current home care market lacks sufficient regulation, leading to market chaos, similar to the "Wild West."
- They hope to introduce stronger regulatory standards to improve service quality and exclude non-compliant providers.
- They wish to establish an authorization system where only companies meeting certain service standards can enter the market.
- They support the separation of roles between purchasers, providers, and regulators to ensure fair competition.
2. **Financial Policies**:
- Private providers tend to support a state-funded personal budget system, allowing clients to freely choose among different licensed providers.
- If a personal budget system cannot be implemented, they are also willing to consider other financing mechanisms as long as they ensure sufficient and stable funding.
- They oppose relying entirely on out-of-pocket payments, as this cannot raise enough funds to support home care services.
3. **Labor Policies**:
- Private providers hope to increase the supply of home care labor to address the current shortage.
- They suggest issuing work permits to home care workers from non-EU economic areas to increase labor supply.
- They emphasize the need to establish a sustainable career structure to attract and retain care workers.
### Conclusion
By analyzing the case of the Irish home care market, this paper reveals the policy preferences of private for-profit home care service providers and discusses how these preferences influence the political and economic dynamics of the long-term care market. These findings are not only applicable to Ireland but may also be relevant to other welfare markets at different stages of development and institutional contexts.