Abstract:Recently, many large language models (LLMs) have been proposed, showing advanced proficiency in code generation. Meanwhile, many efforts have been dedicated to evaluating LLMs on code generation benchmarks such as HumanEval. Although being very helpful for comparing different LLMs, existing evaluation focuses on a sim-ple code generation scenario (i.e., function-level or statement-level code generation), which mainly asks LLMs to generate one single code unit (e.g., a function or a statement) for the given natural language description. Such evaluation focuses on generating independent and often small-scale code units, thus leaving it unclear how LLMs perform in real-world software development scenarios. To fill this knowledge gap, we make the first attempt to evaluate LLMs in a more challenging code generation scenario, i.e., class-level code generation. Compared with existing code generation benchmarks, it better reflects real-world software development scenarios due to it comprising broader contextual dependencies and multiple, interdependent units of code. We first manually construct the first class-level code generation benchmark ClassEval of 100 class-level Python code generation tasks with approximately 500 person-hours. Based on the new benchmark ClassEval, we then perform the first study of 11 state-of-the-art LLMs on class-level code generation. Based on our results, we find that all LLMs perform much worse on class-level code generation compared to the method-level. While GPT models still dominate other LLMs on class-level code generation, the performance rankings of other models on method-level code generation no longer holds for class-level code generation. Besides, most models (except GPT models) perform better when generating the class method by method; and they have the limited ability of generating dependent code. Based on our findings, we call for software engineering (SE) researchers' expertise to build more LLM benchmarks based on practical and complicated software development scenarios.

A Self-Iteration Code Generation Method Based on Large Language Models

Self-planning Code Generation with Large Language Models

Self-collaboration Code Generation via ChatGPT

SelfEvolve: A Code Evolution Framework via Large Language Models

Evaluating Large Language Models in Class-Level Code Generation

The First Prompt Counts the Most! An Evaluation of Large Language Models on Iterative Example-based Code Generation

On the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Domain-Specific Code Generation

Think Outside the Code: Brainstorming Boosts Large Language Models in Code Generation

Large Language Models as Test Case Generators: Performance Evaluation and Enhancement

Enabling Programming Thinking in Large Language Models Toward Code Generation

Code Generation Using Self-Interactive Assistant

What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study

An Empirical Study on Self-correcting Large Language Models for Data Science Code Generation

Planning-Driven Programming: A Large Language Model Programming Workflow

When LLM-based Code Generation Meets the Software Development Process

Where Are Large Language Models for Code Generation on GitHub?

ROCODE: Integrating Backtracking Mechanism and Program Analysis in Large Language Models for Code Generation

A Deep Dive into Large Language Model Code Generation Mistakes: What and Why?

CYCLE: Learning to Self-Refine the Code Generation

Examination of Code generated by Large Language Models