Abstract:Context. The imaging sharpness of an X-ray telescope is chiefly determined by the optical quality of its focusing optics, which in turn mostly depends on the shape accuracy and the surface finishing of the grazing-incidence X-ray mirrors that compose the optical modules. To ensure the imaging performance during the mirror manufacturing, a fundamental step is predicting the mirror point spread function (PSF) from the metrology of its surface. Traditionally, the PSF computation in X-rays is assumed to be different depending on whether the surface defects are classified as figure errors or roughness. This classical approach, however, requires setting a boundary between these two asymptotic regimes, which is not known a priori. Aims. The aim of this work is to overcome this limit by providing analytical formulae that are valid at any light wavelength, for computing the PSF of an X-ray mirror shell from the measured longitudinal profiles and the roughness power spectral density, without distinguishing spectral ranges with different treatments. Methods. The method we adopted is based on the Huygens-Fresnel principle for computing the diffracted intensity from measured or modeled profiles. In particular, we have simplified the computation of the surface integral to only one dimension, owing to the grazing incidence that reduces the influence of the azimuthal errors by orders of magnitude. The method can be extended to optical systems with an arbitrary number of reflections – in particular the Wolter-I, which is frequently used in X-ray astronomy – and can be used in both near- and far-field approximation. Finally, it accounts simultaneously for profile, roughness, and aperture diffraction. Results. We describe the formalism with which one can self-consistently compute the PSF of grazing-incidence mirrors, and we show some PSF simulations including the UV band, where the aperture diffraction dominates the PSF, and hard X-rays where the X-ray scattering has a major impact on the PSF degradation. The results are validated with ray-tracing simulations, or by comparison with the analytical computation of the half-energy width based on the known scattering theory, where these approaches are applicable. Finally, we validate this by comparing the simulated PSF of a real Wolter-I mirror shell with the measured PSF in hard X-rays.

Analytical Model of Point Spread Function under Defocused Degradation in Diffraction-Limited Systems: Confluent Hypergeometric Function

Performance analysis and evaluation of point spread function for full digital autofocus

Resolution and Contrast Enhancements of Optical Microscope Based on Point Spread Function Engineering

Research Progress of Computational Microscopy Imaging Based on Point Spread Function Engineering

Analysis of optical systems with extended depth of field using the Wigner distribution function.

Realization Method of Full-Field Point Spread Function

Semi-analytic Fresnel Diffraction Calculation with Polynomial Decomposition

Analysis of Optimal Degradation Model of Defocus Image

Analytical Description of Sub-Diffraction Dark Spot

A METHOD TO ANALYZE EFFECTS OF DIFFRACTION EFFICIENCY OF DIFFRACTION OPTICAL ELEMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID OPTICAL SYSTEM

Fast Wavefront Sensing Method Based on Diffraction Basis Vectors for Tightly Focused Optical Systems

Distortion Correction in Surface Defects Evaluating System of Large Fine Optics

Point Spread Function Engineering Based on Wavefront Phase Modulation

Point spread function modeling for a free space optical system

Mirrors for X-ray telescopes: Fresnel diffraction-based computation of point spread functions from metrology

Point Spread Function Characteristics Analysis of the Wavefront Coding System.

Measure and Model a 3-D Space-Variant PSF for Fluorescence Microscopy Image Deblurring.

Estimation of transmitted wavefronts at defocused positions in a broad bandwidth range

Calculating Point Spread Functions: Methods, Pitfalls and Solutions

Theoretical Analysis of Diffraction Imaging in Fourier Ptychography Microscopy

Analysis of numerical diffraction calculation methods: from the perspective of phase space optics and the sampling theorem