Abstract:Introduction: In lumbar spinal stabilization pedicle screws are used as standard. However, especially in osteoporosis, screw anchorage is a problem. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) is an alternative technique designed to increase stability without the use of cement. In this regard, comparative studies showed biomechanical superiority of the MC (midline cortical bone trajectory) technique with longer cortical progression over the CBT technique. The aim of this biomechanical study was to comparatively investigate the MC technique against the not cemented pedicle screws (TT) in terms of their pullout forces and anchorage properties during sagittal cyclic loading according to the ASTM F1717 test. Methods: Five cadavers (L1 to L5), whose mean age was 83.3 ± 9.9 years and mean T Score of -3.92 ± 0.38, were dissected and the vertebral bodies embedded in polyurethane casting resin. Then, one screw was randomly inserted into each vertebra using a template according to the MC technique and a second one was inserted by freehand technique with traditional trajectory (TT). The screws were quasi-static extracted from vertebrae L1 and L3, while for L2, L4 and L5 they were first tested dynamically according to ASTM standard F1717 (10,000 cycles at 1 Hz between 10 and 110 N) and then quasi-static extracted. In order to determine possible screw loosening, there movements were recorded during the dynamic tests using an optical measurement system. Results: The pull-out tests show a higher pull-out strength for the MC technique of 555.4 ± 237.0 N compared to the TT technique 448.8 ± 303.2 N. During the dynamic tests (L2, L4, L5), 8 out of the 15 TT screws became loose before completing 10,000 cycles. In contrast, all 15 MC screws did not exceed the termination criterion and were thus able to complete the full test procedure. For the runners, the optical measurement showed greater relative movement of the TT variant compared to the MC variant. The pull-out tests also revealed that the MC variant had a higher pull-out strength, measuring at766.7 ± 385.4 N, while the TT variant measured 637.4 ± 435.6 N. Conclusion: The highest pullout forces were achieved by the MC technique. The main difference between the techniques was observed in the dynamic measurements, where the MC technique exhibited superior primary stability compared to the conventional technique in terms of primary stability. Overall, the MC technique in combination with template-guided insertion represents the best alternative for anchoring screws in osteoporotic bone without cement.

Preventing Iatrogenic Fibula Fractures Using the Push-Pull Technique: A Biomechanical Comparison of Unicortical Versus Bicortical Post Screws

Biomechanical testing of a computationally optimized far cortical locking plate versus traditional implants for distal femur fracture repair

Bicortical Compression and Construct Stability With Variable Pitch Locking Screws in Cadaveric Specimens

Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Method of Tricortical Kirschner Wire Fixation of Distal Chevron Osteotomies of the First Metatarsal Versus Traditional Kirschner Wire and Versus Screw Fixation.

Effect of Screw Length in Volar Plating for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

The addition of cerclage wiring does not improve proximal bicortical fixation of locking plates for Type C periprosthetic fractures in synthetic humeri

Osteosynthesis of Phalangeal Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Kirschner Wires, Plates, and Compression Screws

Biomechanics of internal fixation in Hoffa fractures – A comparison of four different constructs

Biomechanical comparisons of different diagonal screw designs in a novel embedded calcaneal slide plate

Biomechanical superiority of locking plate designed with cluster of head screws compared to conventional buttress plate for fixation of posteromedial tibial plateau fractures: A computational assessment

Biomechanical analysis of push–pull principle versus traditional approach in locking plates for proximal humeral fracture treatment

Surgical Fixation of Calcaneal Beak Fractures-Biomechanical Analysis of Different Osteosynthesis Techniques

A Novel Spiked Washer and Screw Technique Provides a Biomechanically Superior Posterolateral Corner and Arcuate Fracture Repair

Comparing the Biomechanical Stability of Cerclage Cable with Plate Insert Versus Locking Screw in Periprosthetic Humeral Fracture

Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and plate osteosynthesis for extra-articular proximal tibial fractures with segmental bone defect

Biomechanics and finite element analysis comparing posterior T-plates with LCP for fixation of posterolateral tibial plate fractures

Augmentative Plating for Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: a Biomechanical Study

Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone

Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures With Intramedullary Threaded Nail and Dorsal Plate

A biomechanical comparison of the double-row suture fixation and compression screw techniques in the treatment of lateral malleolar avulsion fracture

Dorsal Plating, Lateral Plating, and Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Extra-Articular Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison