Role of Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Deemantha G. Fernando,Rodney Sparapani,Harveshp Mogal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27956
2024-11-25
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:Introduction While systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay of treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA‐PC), its efficacy and outcomes remain poor. Therefore, the role of curative‐intent surgery needs to be better defined. Using a systematic review and meta‐analysis, this study aims to define the role of CRS/HIPEC in patients with SBA‐PC. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for studies published between 1990 and 2023. Articles were scored and incorporated within approximate normality of means/proportions formulae to compare outcomes of CRS/HIPEC and SC alone. Results Ten studies with 461 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC and seven studies with 285 patients undergoing SC alone were identified. In the CRS/HIPEC group, 215 (46.6%) were male and the median age was 46.5–66 years. The primary tumor was located mostly in the duodenum (n = 169, 36.7%) and ileum (n = 108, 23.4%). Grade was unspecified in most patients (n = 232, 50.3%). Median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) ranged between 10 and 12, and 93.1% underwent complete cytoreduction (CC 0/1). CRS/HIPEC‐related major morbidity and mortality was 20.7% (SD = 2.5, 95% CI 15.6–25.6) and 1.7% (SD = 0.8, 95% CI 0.1–3.3), respectively. With a median follow‐up of 21.1 (SD = 1.1, 95% CI 18.9–23.3) months, CRS/HIPEC demonstrated median overall survival of 32.3 (SD = 1.19, 95% CI 30–34.6) versus 14.5 (SD = 0.19, 95% CI 14.1–14.9) months for SC alone (p
oncology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?