Abstract:Hiatus hernias (HH) are a common cause of symptoms and complications, with considerable variation in anatomy, function, diagnosis and treatment. We undertook the first systematic review to appraise how HH are diagnosed and classified in the literature, using randomized controlled trials as a sample. A search was performed in July 2021of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and 2832 articles were identified and 64 were included. Median Jadad score was 2. Studies demonstrated considerable variation in diagnosis, classification and minimum surgical steps. The commonest classifications before surgery were axial length and the Type I-IV classification, variably assessed by endoscopy and contrast swallow. Intra-operatively, the commonest classification was type I-IV. A minority used more than one classification, or alternatives such as defect size and Hill classification. Most studies reported minimum steps, but these varied. Only a minority reported criteria for diagnosing recurrence. Using randomized controlled trials to appraise the highest quality evidence in the literature, we found considerable variation and inconsistency in the way HH are diagnosed and classified. This lack of a 'common language' has significant impacts for the generalizability of evidence, study synthesis and design. We propose the development of an internationally accepted classification. We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.

Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cruroplasty with or without mesh? A systematic literature review with a novel time-organized proportion meta-analysis

[Laparoscopic Anti-Reflux Surgery with Biological Mesh in Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease].

Effect of biological mesh on hiatal hernia repair: One-year follow-up

Tension‐free mesh versus suture‐alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double‐blind clinical trial

Lessons learned from revision procedures: a case series pleading for reinforcement of the anterior hiatus in recurrent hiatal hernia

Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair

Navigating hernia sac management in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: to abandon or to reduce? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotics vs Laparoscopy in Foregut Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Analyzing Hiatal Hernia Repair and Heller Myotomy

Clinical and computed tomography outcomes after mesh‐enforced hiatoplasty and anterior hemi‐fundoplication in large hiatal hernia repair

Operative versus conservative management for inguinal hernia: a methodology scoping review of randomized controlled trials

Morbidity and mortality following hiatal hernia repair in geriatric patients: a multicenter research network study

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of ventral hernia: biologic versus synthetic mesh

Systematic review of the perioperative classification, diagnosis, description and repair of hiatus hernias in randomized controlled trials

Prophylactic Mesh Placement in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Laparotomy: A Systematic Review

Efficacy and safety of mesh non-fixation in patients undergoing laparo-endoscopic repair of groin hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term results after laparoscopic revision fundoplication: a retrospective, single-center analysis in 194 patients with recurrent hiatal hernia

UMBILICAL AND EPIGASTRIC HERNIA REPAIR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Forgoing Preoperative Manometry for Minimally Invasive Hiatal Hernia Repair

[Antireflux laparoscopic intervention]