Abstract:Although body mass index (BMI) is the most commonly used anthropometric measure, newer indices such as the waist-to-height ratio, better reflect the location and amount of ectopic fat, as well as the weight of the skeleton, and may be more useful. The prognostic value of several newer anthropometric indices was compared with that of BMI in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure. The primary outcome was HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. The association between anthropometric indices and outcomes were comprehensively adjusted for other prognostic variables, including natriuretic peptides. An 'obesity-survival paradox' related to lower mortality risk in those with BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 (compared with normal weight) was identified but this was eliminated by adjustment for other prognostic variables. This paradox was less evident for waist-to-height ratio (as an exemplar of indices not incorporating weight) and eliminated by adjustment: the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause mortality, for quintile 5 vs. quintile 1, was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.39]. However, both BMI and waist-to-height ratio showed that greater adiposity was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome and HF hospitalization; this was more evident for waist-to-height ratio and persisted after adjustment e.g. the aHR for HF hospitalization for quintile 5 vs. quintile 1 of waist-to-height ratio was 1.39 (95% CI 1.06–1.81). In patients with HFrEF, alternative anthropometric measurements showed no evidence for an 'obesity-survival paradox'. Newer indices that do not incorporate weight showed that greater adiposity was clearly associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization. The upper part of the figure describes the calculation of each of the anthropometric measures. The lower part of the figure shows the risk of outcomes according to continuous body mass index (left panel) and waist-to-height ratio (right panel). The solid line represents the hazard ratio and the shaded area the 95% confidence interval. The blue spline is adjusted for treatment and region. The red spline is adjusted for treatment, age, sex, region, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, estimated glomerular filtration rate, left ventricular ejection fraction, log of n -terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, body mass index (only in the waist-to-height ratio analyses), New York Heart Association functional class, heart failure aetiology, duration of heart failure, prior heart failure hospitalization, a history of diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. BMI, body mass index; BRI, body roundness index; BSA, body surface area; BSI, body shape index; CI, confidence interval; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; RFM, relative fat mass; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; WHtR, waist-to-height ratio; WWI, weight-adjusted-waist index.

An unexpected paradox: wall shear stress in the aorta is less in patients with severe atherosclerosis regardless of obesity

Obesity and the obesity paradox in abdominal aortic aneurysm

The Effect of Obesity on Short- and Long-Term Outcome after Surgical Treatment for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Mortality is lowest in overweight followed by obese and morbid obese patients and is highest in cachexia compared to normal weight in patients with the diagnosis of aortic stenosis.

Obesity and acute type A aortic dissection: unraveling surgical outcomes through the lens of the upper hemisternotomy approach

High Wall Shear Stress Is Related to Atherosclerotic Plaque Rupture in the Aortic Arch of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Study with Computational Fluid Dynamics Model and Non-Obstructive General Angioscopy

Anthropometric measures and adverse outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: revisiting the obesity paradox

Wall shear stress and relative residence time as potential risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in males: a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance case–control study

Inverse association between obesity and aortic pressure augmentation is attenuated in women: the Wakuya study

Relationship between obesity, cardiac hemodynamics, and heart failure in adults with coarctation of aorta

Association of Weight and Body Composition on Cardiac Structure and Function in the ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities)

Significance of Adipose Tissue Quantity and Distribution on Obesity Paradox in Heart Failure

The Obesity Paradox Exists for Perioperative Complications and Mortality Following Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass Surgery

Anthropometric measures and long‐term mortality in non‐ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Questioning the obesity paradox

Age differences in the association of body mass index-defined obesity with abdominal aortic calcification

Effect of body mass index on mortality for diabetic patients with aortic stenosis

Adverse prognosis associated with asymmetric myocardial thickening in aortic stenosis

OBESITY PARADOX, WEIGHT-FREE ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASURES, AND MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN THE ELDERLY: INSIGHT FROM THE NORTHERN SHANGHAI STUDY

Body weight and physical fitness in women with ischaemic heart disease: does physical fitness contribute to our understanding of the obesity paradox in women?

The "obesity paradox" in patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from the Gulf SAFE registry

Re-appraisal of the obesity paradox in heart failure: a meta-analysis of individual data