Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing

H. Clahsen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197815.355
Abstract:2 1. Introduction What's the use of theoretical linguistics for understanding human language processing? Looking at the vast majority of studies on morphological processing, the impression one will get is: not much. For example, casual inspection of the major international journals in experimental psycholinguistics (Cognition, Language and Cognitive Processes, Brain and Language, Journal of Memory and Language) reveals hardly any reference to notions and concepts from theoretical morphology. Instead, it is claimed that morphological distinctions have little effect on performance and that other (non-morphological) factors determine how a morphologically complex word is processed (see e.g. Raveh and Rueckl 2000). Connectionist models represent one of the most popular approaches, and most connectionist models are indeed 'eliminative' (Marcus 2001) in the sense that all inflected or derived words are said to be stored within a single associative system without any explicit representation of their morphological structure (see e. among others). Instead, these studies implement networks that represent the mapping relationship between the base of a word and its inflected or derived form through associatively linked orthographic, phonological and semantic codes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?