Abstract:Aims. Our goal is to propagate multiple eruptions –obtained through numerical simulations performed in a previous study– to 1 AU and to analyse the effects of different background solar winds on their dynamics and structure at Earth. We also aim to improve the understanding of why some consecutive eruptions do not result in the expected geoeffectiveness, and how a secondary coronal mass ejection (CME) can affect the configuration of the preceding one. Methods. Using the 2.5D magnetohydrodynamics package of the code MPI-AMRVAC, we numerically modelled consecutive CMEs inserted in two different solar winds by imposing shearing motions onto the inner boundary, which in our case represents the low corona. In one of the simulations, the secondary CME was a stealth ejecta resulting from the reconfiguration of the coronal field. The initial magnetic configuration depicts a triple arcade structure shifted southward, and embedded into a bimodal solar wind. We triggered eruptions by imposing shearing motions along the southernmost polarity inversion line, and the computational mesh tracks them via a refinement method that applies to current-carrying structures, and is continuously adapted throughout the simulations. We also compared the signatures of some of our eruptions with those of a multiple CME event that occurred in September 2009 using data from spacecraft around Mercury and Earth. Furthermore, we computed and analysed the Dst index for all the simulations performed. Results. The observed event fits well at 1 AU with two of our simulations, one with a stealth CME and the other without. This highlights the difficulty of attempting to use in situ observations to distinguish whether or not the second eruption was stealthy, because of the processes the flux ropes undergo during their propagation in the interplanetary space. We simulate the CMEs propagated in two different solar winds, one slow and another faster one. In the first case, plasma blobs arise in the trail of eruptions. The faster solar wind simulations create no plasma blobs in the aftermath of the eruptions, and therefore we interpret them as possible indicators of the initial magnetic configuration, which changes along with the background wind. Interestingly, the Dst computation results in a reduced geoeffectiveness in the case of consecutive CMEs when the flux ropes arrive with a leading positive B z . When the B z component is reversed, the geoeffectiveness increases, meaning that the magnetic reconnections with the trailing blobs and eruptions strongly affect the impact of the arriving interplanetary CME.

Exploring the Impact of the Aging Effect on Inferred Properties of Solar Coronal Mass Ejections

Investigating the Magnetic Structure of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections using Simultaneous Multi-Spacecraft In situ Measurements

Contribution of the aging effect to the observed asymmetry of interplanetary magnetic clouds

Investigating Remote-sensing Techniques to Reveal Stealth Coronal Mass Ejections

Radial Evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections Between MESSENGER, Venus Express, STEREO, and L1: Catalog and Analysis

Quantifying the Propagation of Fast Coronal Mass Ejections from the Sun to Interplanetary Space Combining Remote Sensing and Multi-Point in-situ Observations

Non-conventional Approach for Deriving the Radial Sizes of Coronal Mass Ejections at Different Instances: Discrepancies in the Estimates Between Remote and In Situ Observations

Evolution of the Radial Size and Expansion of Coronal Mass Ejections Investigated by Combining Remote and In-Situ Observations

Investigation of the Forces that Govern the Three-Dimensional Propagation and Expansion of Coronal Mass Ejections from Sun to Earth

Probing the Thermodynamic State of a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) Up to 1 AU

Combined Multipoint Remote and In Situ Observations of the Asymmetric Evolution of a Fast Solar Coronal Mass Ejection

Study of the propagation, in situ signatures, and geoeffectiveness of shear-induced coronal mass ejections in different solar winds

A Survey of Coronal Mass Ejections Measured In Situ by Parker Solar Probe during 2018–2022

A Survey of Coronal Mass Ejections Measured In Situ by Parker Solar Probe During 2018-2022

3D Reconstruction and Interplanetary Expansion of the 2010 April 3rd CME

Modeling Interplanetary Expansion and Deformation of CMEs with ANTEATR-PARADE I: Relative Contribution of Different Forces

Revisiting Empirical Solar Energetic Particle Scaling Relations II. Coronal Mass Ejections

Parametric study of the kinematic evolution of coronal mass ejection shock waves and their relation to flaring activity

Quantitative Analysis of CME Deflections in the Corona

Discrepancies in the Properties of a Coronal Mass Ejection on Scales of 0.03~au as Revealed by Simultaneous Measurements at Solar Orbiter and Wind: The 2021 November 3--5 Event