Abstract:Objective: Traditional knowledge-based and machine learning diagnostic decision support systems have benefited from integrating the medical domain knowledge encoded in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) to supplant traditional systems poses questions of the quality and extent of the medical knowledge in the models' internal knowledge representations and the need for external knowledge sources. The objective of this study is three-fold: to probe the diagnosis-related medical knowledge of popular LLMs, to examine the benefit of providing the UMLS knowledge to LLMs (grounding the diagnosis predictions), and to evaluate the correlations between human judgments and the UMLS-based metrics for generations by LLMs. Methods: We evaluated diagnoses generated by LLMs from consumer health questions and daily care notes in the electronic health records using the ConsumerQA and Problem Summarization datasets. Probing LLMs for the UMLS knowledge was performed by prompting the LLM to complete the diagnosis-related UMLS knowledge paths. Grounding the predictions was examined in an approach that integrated the UMLS graph paths and clinical notes in prompting the LLMs. The results were compared to prompting without the UMLS paths. The final experiments examined the alignment of different evaluation metrics, UMLS-based and non-UMLS, with human expert evaluation. Results: In probing the UMLS knowledge, GPT-3.5 significantly outperformed Llama2 and a simple baseline yielding an F1 score of 10.9% in completing one-hop UMLS paths for a given concept. Grounding diagnosis predictions with the UMLS paths improved the results for both models on both tasks, with the highest improvement (4%) in SapBERT score. There was a weak correlation between the widely used evaluation metrics (ROUGE and SapBERT) and human judgments. Conclusion: We found that while popular LLMs contain some medical knowledge in their internal representations, augmentation with the UMLS knowledge provides performance gains around diagnosis generation. The UMLS needs to be tailored for the task to improve the LLMs predictions. Finding evaluation metrics that are aligned with human judgments better than the traditional ROUGE and BERT-based scores remains an open research question.

Integrating Automated Knowledge Extraction with Large Language Models for Explainable Medical Decision-Making

Large Language Models and Medical Knowledge Grounding for Diagnosis Prediction

Leveraging A Medical Knowledge Graph into Large Language Models for Diagnosis Prediction

Deciphering Diagnoses: How Large Language Models Explanations Influence Clinical Decision Making

Aligning Human Knowledge with Visual Concepts Towards Explainable Medical Image Classification

Improving Clinical Expertise in Large Language Models Using Electronic Medical Records

Integrated Application of LLM Model and Knowledge Graph in Medical Text Mining and Knowledge Extraction

Towards Uncovering How Large Language Model Works: An Explainability Perspective

Fine-tuning language model embeddings to reveal domain knowledge: An explainable artificial intelligence perspective on medical decision making

On the role of the UMLS in supporting diagnosis generation proposed by Large Language Models

Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer

Explainable Diagnosis Prediction through Neuro-Symbolic Integration

Argumentative Large Language Models for Explainable and Contestable Decision-Making

Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales

Enhancing Explainability in Multimodal Large Language Models Using Ontological Context

Benchmarking Large Language Models on Answering and Explaining Challenging Medical Questions

Large Language Models Illuminate a Progressive Pathway to Artificial Intelligent Healthcare Assistant

Interpretable Differential Diagnosis with Dual-Inference Large Language Models

Interpretable Medical Diagnostics with Structured Data Extraction by Large Language Models