Abstract:Background: The most common route to a diagnosis of cancer is through primary care. Delays in diagnosing cancer occur when an opportunity to make a timely diagnosis is missed and is evidenced by patients visiting the general practitioner (GP) on multiple occasions before referral to a specialist. Tools that minimize prolonged diagnostic intervals and reduce missed opportunities to investigate patients for cancer are therefore a priority. Objective: This study aims to explore the usefulness and feasibility of a novel quality improvement (QI) tool in which algorithms flag abnormal test results that may be indicative of undiagnosed cancer. This study allows for the optimization of the cancer recommendations before testing the efficacy in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: GPs, practice nurses, practice managers, and consumers were recruited to participate in individual interviews or focus groups. Participants were purposively sampled as part of a pilot and feasibility study, in which primary care practices were receiving recommendations relating to the follow-up of abnormal test results for prostate-specific antigen, thrombocytosis, and iron-deficiency anemia. The Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) was applied to the analysis using a thematic approach. Results: A total of 17 interviews and 3 focus groups (n=18) were completed. Participant themes were mapped to CP-FIT across the constructs of context, recipient, and feedback variables. The key facilitators to use were alignment with workflow, recognized need, the perceived importance of the clinical topic, and the GPs' perception that the recommendations were within their control. Barriers to use included competing priorities, usability and complexity of the recommendations, and knowledge of the clinical topic. There was consistency between consumer and practitioner perspectives, reporting language concerns associated with the word cancer, the need for more patient-facing resources, and time constraints of the consultation to address patients' worries. Conclusions: There was a recognized need for the QI tool to support the diagnosis of cancer in primary care, but barriers were identified that hindered the usability and actionability of the recommendations in practice. In response, the tool has been refined and is currently being evaluated as part of a randomized controlled trial. Successful and effective implementation of this QI tool could support the detection of patients at risk of undiagnosed cancer in primary care and assist in preventing unnecessary delays.

Validation of Quality Assessment Measures for Inpatient Gastroenterology Consults on Oncologic Patients in Non-teaching Services at a Cancer Center: A Cross-Sectional Study

Quality of Endoscopy Reports for Esophageal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?

Development of Quality Measures for the Care of Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool

Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis

Measuring the quality of care in metastatic colorectal cancer: a scoping review of quality indicators

A Critical Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Information on Gastric Cancer Available on the Internet for Patients

Quality indicators for evaluating cancer care in low-income and middle-income country settings: a multinational modified Delphi study

Optimization of a Quality Improvement Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Qualitative Study

Validation of a tagalog version of the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and EORTC OUT-PATSAT7 patient satisfaction questionnaires for patients with cancer undergoing outpatient radiotherapy.

Assessment of colonoscopy skill using machine learning to measure quality: Proof-of-concept and initial validation

Design and pilot implementation of an evaluation tool assessing professionalism, communication and collaboration during a unique global health elective

S986 Quality Initiative to Instate Accurate Guaiac Fecal Occult Blood Test Requests and Interpretation to Decrease Unnecessary Testing, Misdiagnosing, and Improve Cost in a Large Community Hospital

Evaluating the use of Clavien-Dindo classification and Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire as quality indicators in gynecologic endoscopy

Defining the Denominator for Measuring Quality of End-of-Life Care in Children with Cancer: Results of a Nominal Group Technique

Exploring Endoscopic Competence in Gastroenterology Training: A Simulation-Based Comparative Analysis of GAGES, DOPS, and ACE Assessment Tools

Impact of Quality Improvement Educational Interventions on Documented Adherence to Quality Measures for Adults with Crohn's Disease

Development and Validation of a Symptom-Focused Quality of Life Questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) for Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastrectomy

A Clinically Relevant Online Patient QA Solution with Daily CT Scans and EPID-basedin Vivodosimetry: a Feasibility Study on Rectal Cancer.

Quality measures in primary care skin cancer management: a qualitative study of the views of key informants

GLIM criteria validation and reliability in critically ill patients with cancer: A prospective study