Abstract:Background Monitoring biodiversity is crucial in biogeography. Citizen science and biodiversity platforms have revolutionized data access across taxa, but they struggle to provide robust raw data essential for conservation decisions. Aims This study addresses data gaps for under‐represented species and locations, observer expertise variability, and the lack of absence data and sampling effort information to improve data representation and suitability for statistical analyses. Materials & Methods We collected, compared to IUCN‐recognized taxonomic groups, all worldwide living being (animal, plant and fungi) observations held by four major biodiversity platforms: eBird, GBIF, iNaturalist, and Observation.org. We also organized such observations by country of origin and based on their Human Development Index (HDI). Results We found that, while GBIF, iNaturalist, and Observation.org cover all life forms, birds are the most observed (eBird is a bird‐specific platform), whereas fish, other marine organisms, arthropods, and invertebrates are dramatically underrepresented. Moreover, none of the above‐mentioned biodiversity platforms considered or directly analysed expertise variability among observers and, apart from eBird, the other three biodiversity platforms do not accommodate data on species absence and sampling effort. Discussion and Conclusion Finally, we found that species observations on biodiversity platforms considered in this study are skewed towards high HDI countries, primarily North America and Europe. By enhancing the effectiveness of biodiversity platforms, this study has the potential to significantly advance the field of biogeography, paving the way for more informed and effective conservation strategies. Overall, our findings underscore the untapped potential of these platforms in contributing to our understanding of the spatial and temporal patterns of biodiversity.

Involving citizens in monitoring the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework

Harnessing online digital data in biodiversity monitoring

Linking Public Participation in Scientific Research to the Indicators and Needs of International Environmental Agreements

Roles of the Red List of Ecosystems in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

The city nature challenge: A global citizen science phenomenon contributing to biodiversity knowledge and informing local government practices

Leveraging citizen science for monitoring urban forageable plants

Measuring the Impact of Conservation: The Growing Importance of Monitoring Fauna, Flora and Funga

Cities in nature

An operational methodology to identify Critical Ecosystem Areas to help nations achieve the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Discovering urban nature: citizen science and biodiversity on a university campus

Rapid evaluation of habitat connectivity change to safeguard multispecies persistence in human-transformed landscapes

Plants and the Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework: educational approaches to support pro-conservation behaviours

Long-term monitoring of citizen science: driving factors and pandemic impacts

Localizing the sustainable development goals in smart and sustainable cities: how can citizen-generated data support the local monitoring of SDGs? A case study of the Brussels Capital Region

Countries' differentiated responsibilities to fulfill area-based conservation targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Citizen Science As an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence

Ecosystem extent is a necessary but not sufficient indicator of the state of global forest biodiversity

A Framework of Observer-Based Biases in Citizen Science Biodiversity Monitoring: Semi-Structuring Unstructured Biodiversity Monitoring Protocols

Improving Online Citizen Science Platforms for Biodiversity Monitoring

Designing citizen science for water and ecosystem services management in data-poor regions: Challenges and opportunities