Abstract:Absolute rates of violence in mental disorders are low and people with mental illness are similarly likely to be victims as perpetrators of violence [1][2][3] . Violence associated with mental illness is however clinically relevant, as the risk is raised for people with certain mental illnesses relative to the general population [4][5][6] . Violence is an important outcome both for individuals and from a public health perspective 7 . Human costs include physical and psychological harms to victims and their families, and negative health, social and criminal justice consequences for perpetrators, such as those resulting from having a criminal conviction 8,9 . Direct economic costs to health systems result from activities such as mandatory or more intensive treatment, with indirect costs accruing to other systems, such as the criminal justice apparatus and across wider society, for example due to lost productivity 10 .While there is evidence that treating mental illness can reduce the risk of violence, it is a complex relationship with multiple causations [11][12][13][14] . This necessitates a holistic approach to assessment and management that considers individual symptoms, behaviours, interpersonal relationships and social context 15 . A better understanding of causal pathways to violence in those with mental illness would enable preventive measures to be developed and appropriately targeted 16 . Risk assessment tools could allow insights from epidemiological studies to be operationalised to assist professionals in making more informed decisions across a range of clinical and other settings 17,18 . New strategies to reduce aggression are needed and must be robustly evaluated, such as through appropriately designed clinical trials 19 .This research topic brings together five papers examining many of these elements. It spans from investigations of how early childhood experiences relate to adult aggression, to an examination of the characteristics of people receiving mandatory treatment in China.Recognising that the origin of aggression may lie in our early experiences, Koolschijn et al. studied the effect of childhood maltreatment on several outcomes, including aggression, in a sample of 128 forensic psychiatric patients 20 . These authors found that higher scores on measures of childhood maltreatment were associated with higher aggression and violence risk assessment scores. They highlight the need to consider a patient's history of maltreatment to guide risk assessment and treatment approaches. Notably, the presence and severity of childhood maltreatment is found to be a risk factor for violence and offending in the general population, as well as in clinical samples. This association has public health implications for prevention and early intervention, as initiatives to combat child maltreatment could be effective at reducing levels of aggression at a population level [21][22][23] . Schizophrenia is a condition with higher rates of violence compared to the general population, as well as to other forms of mental disorder 4 . Sagayadevan et al. explored how schizophrenia symptom severity could mediate the relationship between aggression, impulsivity and quality of life outcomes in a sample of 397 mental health outpatients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in Singapore. Their analysis found indirect associations between motor impulsivity and self-control with various aspects of quality of life, through symptom severity. This helps elucidate one possible pathway by which impulsivity may impact on quality of life in this population.A key step in reducing violent outcomes for clinical populations is to more readily and consistently integrate knowledge of predictors of violence into clinical practice to better individualise treatment [24][25][26] . To do this effectively we need to have robustly validated risk prediction models tailored to the populations they are used in 27 . Roaldset et al. validated a new violence risk screening tool for young people called V-RISK-Y, adapted from the well-established V-RISK-10 for adults 28,29 . They found V-RISK-Y had an Area Under the Curve of 0.762 for violent behaviour in 67 adolescents admitted to a Norwegian emergency department. V-RISK-Y was also liked by staff who used it. The authors suggest changes to V-RISK-Y and propose further research to evaluate the revised tool.An important issue relating to violence in psychiatric inpatient settings is the associated use of restrictive interventions 30 . Whilst sometimes essential for safety, the practice raises ethical issues and there is increasing emphasis on minimising its use. Hirsch et al. investigated whether implementing new guidelines reduced coercion in German psychiatric wards. The paper presented here as part of the PreVCo randomised controlled trial 31 , examines the baseline characteristics of 55 wards randomly allocated in matched pairs to the new guidelines or -Abstract Truncated-

Acute behavioural disturbance: what's in a name?

Use of ‘acute behavioural disturbance’ in mental health records: differences over time and by ethnicity in a London NHS mental health Trust

Reconstructing truth, deconstructing ADHD: Badiou, onto-epistemological violence and the diagnosis of ADHD

Advanced paramedics' restraint decision-making when managing acute behavioural disturbance (ABD) in the UK pre-hospital ambulance setting: A qualitative investigation

Anger, Irritability, Aggression and Violence: States in search of a diagnostic and treatment ‘home’ Part I – Evolution

[On 'confused persons' and misunderstood behaviour: leads for health and safety services]

"Why can't I say people's names?" Alexinomia as a widespread psychological phenomenon

ADHD and reification: Four ways a psychiatric construct is portrayed as a disease

Qualitative study of patient experiences and care observations during agitation events in the emergency department: implications for systems-based practice

PS10 A novel framework for the diagnosis, management and terminology of ‘dermatitis artefacta’

Attentional bias for negative, positive, and threat words in current and remitted depression

Contingent Electric Skin Shock: An Empirical or Ideological Issue?

The impact of a discarded diagnosis and focus on early warning signs of aggression on relations between user and municipal service providers - a narrative of a complex case

Mental Illness, Problem, Disorder, Distress: Does Terminology Matter when Measuring Stigma?

"Effects of diagnostic disclosure and varying diagnostic terminology on social attitudes to personality disorder: An experimental vignette study": Correction to O'Connor and Murphy (2021).

The Affective Side of Disruptive Behavior: Toward Better Understanding, Assessment, and Treatment

Breaking the Silence: Addressing Domestic Abuse in Mental Health Settings-Identification, Screening, and Responding

Status: New Definition, New Thinking

The changing doctor–patient relationship in psychiatry: observations on recent trends in autism, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, gender dysphoria and mental distress

The impact of adverse events on clinicians: what's in a name?

Editorial: Assessment and management in violence and aggression