Does misdiagnosis explain the schizophrenia epidemic among immigrants from developing countries to Western Europe?

Jean-Paul Selten, Hans W Hoek
2008-12-01
Abstract:A number of studies have found consistent evidence of an increased incidence of schizophrenia among first-and second-generation immigrants from developing countries to Western Europe. According to a meta-analysis [2] the mean weighted relative risk (RR) for these immigrants, compared to the risk for natives, was 3.3 (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 2.8–3.9). The risks differed greatly, however, among the various ethnic groups, with the greatest risks relating to the least successful immigrations (eg, African–Caribbeans in the UK, Moroccan males in the Netherlands, Inuit in Denmark). The meta-analysis found no evidence that these findings were accounted for by misdiagnosis, because the studies that used semi-structured diagnostic interviews and the studies that used other diagnostic methods yielded similarly significant results (RR 3.4; 95% CI: 2.3–4.9; RR 2.8; 95% CI: 2.4–3.4, respectively). Nonetheless …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?