Abstract:The increase in globalization processes, which accelerated the fragmentation of production chains in the global economy, updated the task of clarifying the contribution of each of the element of the chain to the final result. With the consolidation of foreign economic cooperation, on the one hand, new opportunities have opened up for the inclusion in the international division of labor for more and more countries and companies, and on the other hand, risk threats of destroying or breaking relationships in these global value chains have intensified. This updated the task of specifying the real volumes of export-import turnover, cleared of double counted elements. In the early 2010s almost simultaneously there have been launched 3 basic concepts of export decomposition in the categories of value-added trade, prepared by UNCTAD, OECD and the EU. The system-functional analysis of the proposed approaches made it possible, at the same time, to reveal a number of keen questions that asked for clarification, in particular, the underestimation of intangible assets in creating value-added in exports within the framework of a specific global value chain, the measurement of value-added embedded in re-export (re-import) turnover of the country, etc. These aspects received due coverage in foreign and domestic economic literature. However, the latest developments by foreign specialists of the methodology of decomposing exports into the internal and external components of net production and double counted elements in the domestic scientific turnover are still being introduced with some delay. In this regard, the article set the task of conducting a comparative analysis of the main new results achieved, focusing on the methods introduced by A. Nagengast – R. Stehrer (2014) and A. Borin – M. Mancini (2019). At the same time, the main attention was concentrated on identifying breakthrough methodological "increments." It was revealed that new results are in demand not only in the context of macroeconomic analysis of transformational processes in the global economy, but also to an increasing extent to adjust foreign trade policy and develop ways to mitigate the risks of deterioration of bilateral foreign trade relations.

Five Facts about Value-Added Exports and Implications for Macroeconomics and Trade Research

Decomposing Value Added in Gross Exports from a Country and Bilateral Perspective

Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances

Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports

Measuring what matters in value-added trade

Decomposing value added in gross exports

Assessment of Value Added in Foreign Trade: Modern Approaches

Follow the Value Added: Bilateral Gross Export Accounting

Where Does Value-Added Flow in Gross Exports, Mr. Newton? Global Supply Chains and New Regionalization's Effects in the Asia-Pacific

Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports: Comment

The Role of Comparative Advantage in Enhancing Trade in Value-Added Using a Dynamic GMM Model

Foreign Value-Added in China'S Manufactured Exports: Implications for China'S Trade Imbalance

Collateral Imbalances in Intra-European Trade? Accounting for the Difference Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances

Tracing value added in gross exports of China: Comparison with the USA, Japan, Korea, and India based on generalized LMDI

Economic complexity and growth: Can value-added exports better explain the link?

A quantitative analysis of global value chains: why has domestic value-added of China’s exports increased?

The Variety and Quality of a Nation's Exports

Decomposition of value added in gross exports: a critical review

Research on China's Interregional Trade in Value-Added from the Perspective of Value Chain