Sleep disturbance and other co‐occurring conditions in autistic children: A network approach to understanding their inter‐relationships

Amanda L. Richdale,Amy M. Shui,Linnea A. Lampinen,Terry Katz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3233

IF: 4.7

2024-09-22

Autism Research

Abstract:Autistic children frequently have one or more co‐occurring psychological, behavioral, or medical conditions. We examined relationships between child behaviors, sleep, adaptive behavior, autistic traits, mental health conditions, and health in autistic children using network analysis. Network analysis is hypothesis generating and can inform our understanding of relationships between multiple conditions and behaviors, directing the development of transdiagnostic treatments for co‐occurring conditions. Participants were two child cohorts from the Autism Treatment Network registry: ages 2–5 years (n = 2372) and 6–17 years (n = 1553). Least absolute‐shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularized partial correlation network analysis was performed in the 2–5 years cohort (35 items) and the 6–17 years cohort (36 items). The Spinglass algorithm determined communities within each network. Two‐step expected influence (EI2) determined the importance of network variables. The most influential network items were sleep difficulties (2 items) and aggressive behaviors for young children and aggressive behaviors, social problems, and anxious/depressed behavior for older children. Five communities were found for younger children and seven for older children. Of the top three most important bridge variables, night‐waking/parasomnias and anxious/depressed behavior were in both age‐groups, and somatic complaints and sleep initiation/duration were in younger and older cohorts respectively. Despite cohort differences, sleep disturbances were prominent in all networks, indicating they are a transdiagnostic feature across many clinical conditions, and thus a target for intervention and monitoring. Aggressive behavior was influential in the partial correlation networks, indicating a potential red flag for clinical monitoring. Other items of strong network importance may also be intervention targets or screening flags.

psychology, developmental,behavioral sciences