Post-marketing safety surveillance study of a 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine: Comment

Hinpetch Daungsupawong,Viroj Wiwanitkit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2306032
2024-01-24
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Abstract:KEYWORDS: Dear Editor, we would like to share ideas on the publication "Post-marketing safety surveillance study of a 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine in individuals aged 16–26 years in Chongqing, China." Citation 1 The 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine's safety was evaluated in this study. The study examined adverse event complaints that Chongqing received from December 2019 to November 2021. After being vaccinated, 1000 people between the ages of 16 and 26 submitted safety information. In addition to non-vaccination-site adverse effects like weakness, fever, and dizziness, vaccination-site adverse effects like pain, swelling, and induration were the most frequently reported adverse events among vaccine recipients. The majority of vaccination-site incidents were mild to moderate intensity. Serious side effects and discontinuations associated with the 9vHPV vaccination were uncommon. Throughout the trial, eight significant adverse events were recorded; however, none of them were thought to be vaccination-related.
immunology,biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation of the post-marketing safety of the 9-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV) vaccine. Specifically, this study aims to assess the safety of the vaccine by observing the adverse events reported after the administration of the 9vHPV vaccine in individuals aged 16 to 26 in the Chongqing region of China. The research focuses on adverse reactions at the injection site (such as pain, swelling, and induration) as well as non-injection site adverse reactions (such as fatigue, fever, and dizziness), with particular attention to the occurrence of serious adverse events and their correlation with the vaccination. Additionally, the authors point out the limitations of the study and propose directions for future research, including conducting randomized controlled trials to enhance the generalizability of the findings and long-term follow-up studies to assess the overall safety of the vaccine and the persistence of adverse events.