Abstract:When females choose mates, males may respond in several ways: by allowing an evaluation by the female and investing substantially in subsequent reproduction (here, type 1), by allowing evaluation but withholding investment following mating (type 2), or by preventing evaluation and attempting to coerce the female to mate (type 3). In this modeling analysis, we examine the conditions under which these strategies, individually or in combination, are expected to persist in the population primarily using the criterion of evolutionary stability. We also consider the roles of female resistance, social policing, and extra-pair paternity in influencing these outcomes. Using six focal systems taken from primates, fish, birds, and insects, we derived parameters for a game-theoretical model to determine the expected evolutionary stable frequencies or unstable combinations of the male strategies based on system-specific parameter magnitudes. In chimpanzees, guppies, Japanese water striders, and scorpionflies, males making the highest investment in each reproductive event were the sole persisting type; in mallard ducks, an evolutionarily stable mixture of types 1 and 3 prevailed; and in humans, a stable mixture of types 1 and 2 persisted. In accord with the infrequency of consistent coercion across taxa, our results suggest that coercion may often be evolutionarily unstable and available only opportunistically as the strategy of last resort.Significance statementOur game theory model examined mate choice in six species of primates, fish birds, and insects to identify patterns predicted to persist from an evolutionary perspective. We found that differences in ecological, physiological, and behavioral characteristics resulted in the persistence of individual or multiple male mating strategies generally consistent with observations in nature. In particular, coercive males could persist in a population when fertilization rates and reproductive outcomes were similar to those of less forceful males.

A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression

Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy.

Proximate perspectives on the evolution of female aggression: good for the gander, good for the goose?

Gender Differences in Links between Antisocial Features and Forms and Functions of Aggression Among At-Risk Youth

Sex differences in adolescent physical aggression: Evidence from sixty‐three low‐and middle‐income countries

Sex ratio and the evolution of aggression in fruit flies

Growth and aggression: I. Childhood to early adolescence.

Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Aggression

Female mate choice and the emergence of male coercion

Proximal Motives of Sexual Arousal, Power, and Relationship for Sexual Aggression: Supporting the Millennial Shift

Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

Developmental Differences in Early Adolescent Aggression: A Gene × Environment × Intervention Analysis

A Model of Sexual Selection and Female Use of Refuge in A Coercive Mating System

One-sided and mutually aggressive couples: Differences in attachment, conflict prevalence, and coping

Doing Gender, Avoiding Crime: The Gendered Meaning of Criminal Behavior and the Gender Gap in Offending in the United States

Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions

Patterns of Adolescent Aggression and Victimization: Sex Differences and Correlates

Does cost-benefit analysis or self-control predict involvement in two forms of aggression?

The role of resource defensibility in facilitating sexually-selected weapon evolution: An experimental evolution test

From hitting to tattling to gossip: an evolutionary rationale for the development of indirect aggression

Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review.