PISOV: Physics-Informed Separation of Variables Solvers for Full-Chip Thermal Analysis

Liang Chen,Wenxing Zhu,Min Tang,Sheldon X.-D. Tan,Jun-Fa Mao,Jianhua Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcad.2024.3506867
IF: 2.9
2024-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Abstract:Thermal issues are becoming increasingly critical due to rising power densities in high-performance chip design. The need for fast and precise full-chip thermal analysis is evident. Although machine learning (ML)-based methods have been widely used in thermal simulation, their training time remains a challenge. In this paper, we proposed a novel physics-informed separation of variables solver (PISOV) to significantly reduce training time for fast full-chip thermal analysis. Inspired by the recently proposed ThermPINN, we employ a least-square regression method to calculate the unknown coefficients of the cosine series. The proposed PISOV method combines physics-informed neural network (PINN) and separation of variables (SOV) methods. Due to the matrix-solving method of PISOV, its speed is much faster than that of ThermPINN. On top of PISOV, we parameterize effective convection coefficients and power values for surrogate model-based uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis by using neural networks, a task that cannot be accomplished by the SOV method. In the parameterized PISOV, we only need to calculate once to obtain all parameterized results of the hyperdimensional PDEs. Additionally, we study the impact of sampling methods (such as grid, uniform, Sobol, Latin Hypercube Sampling(LHS), Halton, and Hammersly) and hybrid sampling methods on the accuracy of PISOV and parameterized PISOV. Numerical results show that PISOV can achieve a speedup of 245×, and 104× over ThermPINN, and PINN, respectively. Among different sampling methods, the Hammersley sampling method yields the best accuracy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?