Abstract:Automated Program Repair (APR) techniques have drawn wide attention from both academia and industry. Meanwhile, one main limitation with the current state-of-the-art APR tools is that patches passing all the original tests are not necessarily the correct ones wanted by developers, i.e., the plausible patch problem. To date, various Patch-Correctness Checking (PCC) techniques have been proposed to address this important issue. However, they are only evaluated on very limited datasets as the APR tools used for generating such patches can only explore a small subset of the search space of possible patches, posing serious threats to external validity to existing PCC studies. In this paper, we construct an extensive PCC dataset, PraPatch (the largest manually labeled PCC dataset to our knowledge), to revisit all nine state-of-the-art PCC techniques. More specifically, our PCC dataset PraPatch includes 1,988 patches generated from the recent PraPR APR tool, which leverages highly-optimized bytecode-level patch executions and can exhaustively explore all possible plausible patches within its large predefined search space (including well-known fixing patterns from various prior APR tools). Our extensive study of representative PCC techniques on PraPatch has revealed various findings, including: 1) the assumption made by existing static PCC techniques that correct patches are more similar to buggy code than incorrect plausible patches no longer holds, 2) state-of-the-art learning-based techniques tend to suffer from the dataset overfitting problem, 3) while dynamic techniques overall retain their effectiveness on our new dataset, their performance drops substantially on patches with more complicated changes and 4) the very recent naturalness-based techniques can substantially outperform traditional static techniques and could be a promising direction for PCC. Based on our findings, we also provide various guidelines/suggestions for advancing PCC in the near future.

Patch Correctness Assessment: A Survey

On Reliability of Patch Correctness Assessment.

Identifying Patch Correctness in Test-Based Program Repair

A Large-Scale Empirical Review of Patch Correctness Checking Approaches

Attention: Not Just Another Dataset for Patch-Correctness Checking

PatchZero: Zero-Shot Automatic Patch Correctness Assessment

The Future Can’t Help Fix the Past: Assessing Program Repair in the Wild

Automated Patch Assessment for Program Repair at Scale

Automated Classification of Overfitting Patches with Statically Extracted Code Features

Alleviating Patch Overfitting with Automatic Test Generation: A Study of Feasibility and Effectiveness for the Nopol Repair System

Patch Space Exploration using Static Analysis Feedback

APPT: Boosting Automated Patch Correctness Prediction via Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models

A Manual Inspection of Defects4J Bugs and Its Implications for Automatic Program Repair

High-Quality Automated Program Repair

A critical review on the evaluation of automated program repair systems

Partitioning Patches into Test-equivalence Classes for Scaling Program Repair

Can Defects Be Fixed with Weak Test Suites? an Analysis of 50 Defects from Defects4J

Patch Quality and Diversity of Invariant-Guided Search-Based Program Repair

An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Fault Space on Search-Based Automated Program Repair.

Interactive Patch Filtering As Debugging Aid