Machine Learning Corrects Climate Model Biases in Global Flood Projections

Boen Zhang,Louise Slater,Simon Moulds,Michel Wortmann,Neil Hart,Yinxue Liu,Jiabo Yin,Xihui Gu,Grey Nearing,Manuela Brunner,Stephen Roberts
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5493546/v1
2024-01-01
Abstract:Reliable river flood projections are crucial for the development of effective adaptation and mitigation strategies, but the conventional hydroclimatic modelling chain introduces a ‘cascade of uncertainty’ arising from climate model outputs and hydrologic model structures. Here, we assess the potential for machine learning (ML) models to overcome this cascade of uncertainty. We develop data-driven projections of 10-year flood magnitudes by training global ML models directly on the uncorrected historical simulation statistics of 19 CMIP6 global climate models alongside geophysical river basin attributes. We find that ML models driven with uncorrected climate model outputs outperform physics-based hydrologic models driven with bias-corrected climate model outputs, with average error rates reduced by 40%. The ML models learn to correct spatially variable biases in the climate model outputs by adjusting the contribution of basin attributes based on the magnitude of each attribute. For example, they compensate for the underestimation of extreme precipitation intensity in the wettest river basins by increasing the contribution of the aridity predictor to flood magnitude. Our global ML projections in 1.66 million river segments (4,697,400 km) suggest that by 2100, over 34% of rivers may experience larger floods, with comparatively little change in the largest rivers in tropical and dry regions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?