Abstract:Background In an open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial in patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC; NCT02978716), administering trilaciclib prior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS; a key secondary endpoint) versus administering GCb alone (median 19.8 vs 12.6 months; hazard ratio 0.37; P < 0.0001), with a nonsignificant trend toward improved progression-free survival (median 9.0 vs 5.7 months; hazard ratio 0.62; P = 0.13; Tan et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2022). Given murine data suggesting trilaciclib may preserve the long-term function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (He et al. Sci Transl Med. 2017) and improve T-cell memory (Goel et al. Nature. 2017; Lelliott et al. Cancer Discov. 2021; Heckler et al. Cancer Discov. 2021), we examined survival of pts with mTNBC who received subsequent lines of therapy after receiving GCb with or without trilaciclib. Methods In the phase 2 trial, pts with ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC were randomized 1:1:1 to receive GCb on days 1 and 8, trilaciclib prior to GCb on days 1 and 8, or trilaciclib alone on days 1 and 8 and prior to GCb on days 2 and 9. The 2 trilaciclib arms were combined for this analysis. To determine if trilaciclib improved outcomes in pts who received additional therapy after GCb, a post hoc survival analysis was performed using data from pts who received any subsequent anticancer therapy (SACT). Results In the subanalysis of data from pts with mTNBC who received any SACT after the phase 2 trial, clinical characteristics such as demographics, disease variables, duration from study treatment to first SACT, and type of SACT were balanced between the trilaciclib (n = 43) and placebo (n = 20) arms. The most common SACTs were gemcitabine, capecitabine, eribulin, taxanes, checkpoint inhibitors, carboplatin, and anthracyclines. Median OS in pts who had previously received trilaciclib was 32.7 months versus 12.8 months in those who had received placebo, with increasing separation of survival curves over time. Median OS from start of first SACT was 17.4 months in the trilaciclib arms vs 5.8 months in the placebo arm. Improved survival and sustained separation of curves was also observed in pts unable to receive SACT (trilaciclib, n = 25; placebo, n = 14), although the magnitude of benefit was smaller (median 9.4 vs 5.4 months). Mechanistic in vivo murine and in vitro human studies are underway to examine the effect of trilaciclib on the generation of memory T cells. These studies will assess the preferential differentiation of specific memory T-cell subsets along with in vivo assessment of memory T-cell responses following a rechallenge. Further data will be presented to evaluate whether the enhanced generation and preservation of a memory T-cell pool is supportive of improved outcomes in pts receiving SACT. Conclusions Data from the phase 2 study suggest that pts with mTNBC who received trilaciclib prior to cytotoxic chemotherapy have prolonged survival, which is notably improved for pts who are able to receive SACT following discontinuation of trilaciclib. The survival benefit from trilaciclib extends to pts who subsequently received immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or chemotherapy, and also to those who did not receive any SACT. Improved OS in pts receiving trilaciclib may be associated with protection of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and formation of a memory T-cell pool, which is critical for long-term immune surveillance and in eliciting rapid recall responses. OS will be evaluated in pts with mTNBC in the ongoing phase 3 trial of trilaciclib prior to GCb (PRESERVE 2; NCT04799249) and phase 2 trial of trilaciclib prior to sacituzumab govitecan (NCT05113966). Citation Format: Shom Goel, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Kun-Hui Lu, Andrew Beelen, Symantha Melemed, John Yi, Michael Danso, Antoinette Tan. Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who receive trilaciclib prior to cytotoxic chemotherapy exhibit improved survival after receiving subsequent anticancer therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO2-06-12.

Trilaciclib Prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for Patients with Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Phase 3 PRESERVE 1 Trial.

Trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy and atezolizumab in patients with newly diagnosed extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer: A multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled Phase II trial

A Phase III Study of Comparing FOLFOX+/-bevacizumab with FOLFOX+/-bevacizumab+ High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C As First-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Abstract PO2-06-12: Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who receive trilaciclib prior to cytotoxic chemotherapy exhibit improved survival after receiving subsequent anticancer therapy

Abstract P3-06-03: Trilaciclib induces immune changes within the tumor microenvironment in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer

Myeloprotection with trilaciclib in Chinese patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study (TRACES)

Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study

A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of High-Dose Vitamin C Plus FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab in Unresectable Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (VITALITY Study).

FOLFOXIRI or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a propensity score-adjusted analysis from two randomized clinical trials

BACCI: A phase II randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of capecitabine (C) bevacizumab (B) plus atezolizumab (A) or placebo (P) in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): An ACCRU network study

A phase II study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as initial chemotherapy for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: TRICC1414 (BeTRI)

FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab in patients with early-onset metastatic colorectal cancer. A pooled analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFOX plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and ≥3 circulating tumour cells: the randomised phase III VISNÚ-1 trial

Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with bevacizumab in older and younger patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A subgroup analysis of the phase 3 SUNLIGHT trial.

Trifluridine–tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine–tipiracil monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial

AtezoTRIBE: a randomised phase II study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab alone or in combination with atezolizumab as initial therapy for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

Phase II trial of FOLFOX6, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer following progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy: Primary outcome of the phase 3 postMONARCH trial.

Efficacy of FOLFOXIRI versus XELOXIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib Combined with Tislelizumab and Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy (HAIC) for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: an Updated Analysis of Survival.