Micro-structure Modified Decalcified Bone Matrix Scaffolds and Bone Marrow Stem Cell–chondrocyte Co-Cultures Promote Stable Cartilage Regeneration

Zheng Ci,Yingying Huo,Bin Tang,Genke Li,Zenghui Jia,Peiling Zhang,Pengli Wang,Jie Zhu,Xiao Song,Huitang Xia,Liang Duan,Guangdong Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111976
IF: 11.322
2024-01-01
Composites Part B Engineering
Abstract:Achieving stable cartilage regeneration in vivo using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) has been a persistent challenge and requires the simultaneous resolution of two critical issues: a suitable scaffold and endochondral ossification. Decalcified bone matrix (DBM) is potentially an ideal scaffold because of its natural origin and non-toxic degradation. However, its large pore structures, poor mechanical properties after decalcification, and osteoinductive abilities limit its application for BMSC-based cartilage regeneration. To address these issues, we utilized gelatin (GT) freeze-drying, crosslinking technology to fabricate DBM-GT scaffolds and overcome the challenges posed by the pore structure and mechanical properties of DBM. We integrated BMSC–chondrocyte co-culture technology to address the issues of DBM osteogenic activity and endochondral ossification. Our results indicate that DBM-GT offered superior pore structure and mechanical properties over DBM, with an 86% increase in the cell-seeding efficiency, an 81.5% increase in the dry mechanical strength, and a remarkable 653.3% increase in the wet mechanical strength. Sequencing analysis showed that chondrocytes inhibited osteogenic differentiation and promoted chondrogenic differentiation by regulating the Wnt and HIF1 signaling pathways. Importantly, DBM-GT scaffolds loaded with seed cells (80% BMSCs and 20% chondrocytes) achieved regeneration of stable cartilage (in vitro and in vivo) and the complex morphology of chondrofibrous, alternating tracheal-like tissues. These achievements represent innovative solutions for expanding the application areas of DBM and overcoming the bottleneck of regenerating stable cartilage tissue in vivo using BMSCs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?