Abstract:Emission reduction from the coal-dominated power sector is vital for achieving China's carbon mitigation targets. Although the coal expansion has been slowed down due to the cancellation of and delay in new construction, coal-based power was responsible for over one third of China's energy-related CO2 emissions by 2018. Moreover, with a technical lifetime of over 30 years, current investment in coal-based power could hinder CO2 mitigation until 2050. Therefore, it is important to examine whether the current coal-based power planning aligns with the long-term climate targets. This paper introduces China's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) goals and an ambitious carbon budget along with global pathways well-below 2 degrees that are divided into five integrated assessment models, which are two national and three global models. We compare the models' results with bottom-up data on current capacity additions and expansion plans to examine if the NDC targets are in line with 2-degree pathways. The key findings are: 1. NDC goals alone are unlikely to lead to significant reductions in coal-based power generation. On the contrary, more plants may be built before 2030; 2. this would require an average of 187-261 TWh of annual coal-based power capacity reduction between 2030 and 2050 to achieve a 2 degrees C compatible trajectory, which would lead to the stranding of large-scale coal-based power plants; 3. if the reduction in coal power can be brought forward to 2020, the average annual coal-based power reduction required would be 104-155 TWh from 2020 to 2050 and the emissions could peak earlier; 4. early regulations in coal-based power would require accelerated promotion of alternatives between 2020 and 2030, with nuclear, wind and solar power expected to be the most promising alternatives. By presenting the stranding risk and viability of alternatives, we suggest that both the government and enterprises should remain cautious about making new investment in coal-based power sector.

Multi‐energy System Horizon Planning: Early Decarbonisation in China Avoids Stranded Assets

The Decarbonization Pathway of Power System by High-Resolution Model under Different Policy Scenarios in China

China’s Energy Transition Pathway in a Carbon Neutral Vision

Transition of China's power sector consistent with Paris Agreement into 2050: Pathways and challenges

Robust optimization-based dynamic power generation mix evolution under the carbon-neutral target

Multi-Objective Energy Planning for China's Dual Carbon Goals

Multi-level emission impacts of electrification and coal pathways in China's netzero transition

Transition Pathways Towards a Deep Decarbonization Energy System—a Case Study in Sichuan, China

Low-carbon transformation planning of China's power energy system under the goal of carbon neutrality

Pathway toward carbon-neutral electrical systems in China by mid-century with negative CO<sub>2</sub> abatement costs informed by high-resolution modeling

The Transition Pathway of Energy Supply Systems Towards Carbon Neutrality Based on a Multi-Regional Energy Infrastructure Planning Approach: A Case Study of China

A long-term or a short-term decision when planning the decarbonisation transition pathway of power systems? A case study of China

Early transformation of the Chinese power sector to avoid additional coal lock-in

Long-term multi-sector low-carbon transition pathway planning based on modified-grandfathering emission allocation method: A case study of China

Exploring the Pathways toward a Carbon-Neutral Sichuan Power Sector in 2060

Exploration of low-cost green transition opportunities for China's power system under dual carbon goals

Decarbonizing China's Energy System to Support the Paris Climate Goals.

Selection and Optimization of China's Energy Transformation Pathway Under Carbon-Neutral Targets

Multi-objective optimisation model of a low-cost path to peaking carbon dioxide emissions and carbon neutrality in China

Green Roadmap Choice for Coupled System of Power and Urban Heating: Quick Win or Long-Term Strategy?

Multi-Objective Optimization for China’s Power Carbon Emission Reduction by 2035