Guidelines for evaluating the antioxidant activity of lignin via the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay

Davide RIGO,Oliver Musl,Daryna Diment,Mikhail Balakshin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-khsfs
2024-10-30
Abstract:The most widespread procedure to measure the antioxidant activity of lignin is via the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. So far, different experimental procedures (i.e., different solvent, time, etc.) have been used to implement the DPPH methodology without estimating the effect of such modifications on the experimental procedure. To overcome this issue, the impact of the solvent, the time, and the type of substrate on the evaluation of the antioxidant activity (AoA) of lignin via the DPPH assay was investigated in this work. We found that multiple different parameters affect the evaluation of the AoA of lignin: i) the stability of the DPPH radical and the lignin solubility in a given solvent; ii) the importance of reaching steady state (the effect of time); iii) the background noise associated with lignin absorbance at λ = 515 nm (used to monitor the DPPH radical scavenging); iv) lignin structure; v) providing a normalized radical scavenging index (nRSI); vi) comparing nRSI vs. inhibition percentage (IP) values. Overall, our investigation allowed us to provide guidelines on how to perform the DPPH assay for a more reliable evaluation of lignin AoA.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is: how to reliably evaluate the antioxidant activity (AoA) of lignin using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. Currently, different researchers use various experimental conditions (such as solvents, time, etc.) when implementing the DPPH assay, but the impact of these conditions on the assay results has not been fully assessed. Therefore, this study aims to explore the effects of factors such as solvent, time, and substrate type on the evaluation of lignin's antioxidant activity and to provide standardized guidelines to improve the reliability and comparability of the evaluation results. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Effect of solvent**: Different solvents can affect the stability of DPPH radicals and the solubility of lignin, thereby influencing the evaluation of antioxidant activity. 2. **Effect of time**: The time to reach a steady state can affect the evaluation results of antioxidant activity. 3. **Background noise**: The absorbance of lignin at λ = 515 nm can interfere with the measurement of DPPH radical scavenging. 4. **Lignin structure**: Different types of lignin (such as lignin from softwood and hardwood sources) have different structural characteristics, which can affect their antioxidant activity. 5. **Normalized Radical Scavenging Index (nRSI)**: Providing a normalized radical scavenging index for a more accurate evaluation of antioxidant activity. 6. **Comparison of Inhibition Percentage (IP) and nRSI**: Further validating the evaluation method by comparing nRSI and IP values. Overall, the goal of this paper is to provide a set of standardized operational guidelines through systematic research to more reliably evaluate the antioxidant activity of lignin. This will help improve the comparability between different studies and promote progress in the related field.