Prospective and Retrospective Causal Inferences Based on the Potential Outcome Framework

Geng Zhi,Zhang Chao,Wang Xueli,Liu Chunchen,Wei Shaojie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2023-0063
2024-01-01
Journal of Causal Inference
Abstract:In this article, we discuss both prospective and retrospective causal inferences, building on Neyman’s potential outcome framework. For prospective causal inference, we review criteria for confounders and surrogates to avoid the Yule–Simpson paradox and the surrogate paradox, respectively. For retrospective causal inference, we introduce the concepts of posterior causal effects given observed evidence to quantify the causes of effects. The posterior causal effects provide a unified framework for deducing both effects of causes in prospective causal inference and causes of effects in retrospective causal inference. We compare the medical diagnostic approaches based on Bayesian posterior probabilities and posterior causal effects for classification and attribution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?