Efficacy and toxicity analysis of selective BET bromodomain inhibitors in models of inflammatory liver disease

william pomerantz,Luke Doskey,Cole Scholtz,Nora Vail,Shalil Khanal,Amani Lee,Sai Giridhar Sarma Kandanur,Zachariah Hoell,Amelia Huehls,Mohamed Issa,Enis Kostallari,Sheng Cao,Joel Reid,Harmeet Malhi,Vijay Shah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-lm1zq

2024-10-24

Abstract:BET bromodomain inhibitors demonstrate significant promise as anti-inflammatory agents targeting a variety of inflammatory disorders. However, clinical data has demonstrated that the administration of non-selective BET bromodomain inhibitors has led to significant dose-limiting toxicity in clinical settings. More selective inhibitors of the second BET bromodomains, referred to as pan-D2 inhibitors, are better tolerated, however their efficacy varies significantly depending on disease indication. Here, we use three orally bioavailable inhibitors, 1–3, that are either selective for the first N-terminal bromodomain of BRD4 (BRD4-D1 selective), or pan-D1 biased, for assessing their cellular and in vivo efficacy and safety profile in two models of inflammatory liver disease. We compare their effects to known pan-D2 and pan-BET inhibitors. Our results show that pan-D1 biased inhibitor, 3, is as efficacious as the pan-BET inhibitor I-BET151 in reducing inflammation from LPS-induced and drug-induced toxicity, whereas pan-D2 inhibitors are less effective. BRD4-D1 selective inhibitors, 1 and 2, are also efficacious; however, new inhibitors with improved cellular target engagement will be necessary to more thoroughly assess their effects. Finally, BRD4-D1 selective inhibitors are better tolerated in a preclinical model of thrombocytopenia than pan-D1 biased inhibitors, while gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity may be a BRD4-driven effect. These results highlight the importance of assessing specific BET protein and bromodomain functions due to their varying roles in diverse disease models.

Chemistry