Abstract:Objectives Hepatectomy is the best treatment for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) at present, but there has been controversy about the width of surgical margins. In this study, we systematically investigated the effects of different surgical margin widths on the prognosis of patients with ICC undergoing hepatectomy. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2022. Eligibility criteria Cohort studies reported in English with patients who underwent negative marginal (R0) resection were included. The effects of surgical margin width on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with ICC were assessed. Data extraction and synthesis Two investigators independently conducted literature screening and data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using funnel plots and quality was assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Forest plots of HRs and their 95% CIs for outcome indicators were plotted. Heterogeneity was assessed and determined quantitatively using I 2 , and the stability of the study results was evaluated using sensitivity analysis. Analyses were performed using Stata software. Results Nine studies were included. With the wide margin group (≥10 mm) as the control, pooled HR of OS in the narrow margin group (<10 mm) was 1.54 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.77). HRs of OS in three subgroups where the margin was less than 5 mm ranged from 5 mm to 9 mm, or was less than 10 mm in length were 1.88 (1.45 to 2.42), 1.33 (1.03 to 1.72) and 1.49 (1.20 to 1.84), respectively. Pooled HR of DFS in the narrow margin group (<10 mm) was 1.51 (1.14 to 2.00). Pooled HR of RFS in the narrow margin group (<10 mm) was 1.35 (1.19 to 1.54). HRs of RFS in three subgroups where the margin was less than 5 mm ranged from 5 mm to 9 mm, or was less than 10 mm in length were 1.38 (1.07 to 1.78), 1.39 (1.11 to 1.74) and 1.30 (1.06 to 1.60), respectively. Neither lymph node lesions (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.70) nor lymph node invasion (2.14, 1.39 to 3.28) was favourable for postoperative OS in patients with ICC. Lymph node metastasis (1.31, 1.09 to 1.57) was unfavourable for RFS in patients with ICC. Conclusion Patients with ICC who underwent curative hepatectomy with a negative margin ≥10 mm may have a long-term survival advantage, but lymph node dissection also needs to be considered. In addition, tumour-related pathological features need to be explored to see if they affect the surgical outcome of R0 margins.

The Status of Liver Margin in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study.

The Status of Liver Margin in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Pattern and extent of intrahepatic infiltration of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma - A case-control study based on liver panoramic digital pathology

Narrow-Margin Hepatectomy Resulted in Higher Recurrence and Lower Overall Survival for R0 Resection Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Prognostic Value of Resection Margin Length after Surgical Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Comparative study on left-sided versus right-sided hepatectomy for resectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The predictive value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio for overall survival in cholangiocarcinoma patients with hepatic resection

The impact of positive resection margin in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, ductal margin vs radial margin

The Relevance of Radial Margin Status in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Narrative Review

Effect of surgical margin on recurrence based on preoperative circulating tumor cell status in hepatocellular carcinoma

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: a Propensity Score-Based Analysis

Prognostic impact of liver resection side in peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Can Laparoscopic Liver Resection Provide a Favorable Option for Patients with Large or Multiple Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas?

Comparative study of short-and long-term results in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing surgical resection: does the extent and side of resection really affect outcome?

Analysis of Survival Factors after Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Does the R1 Margin Matter?

Number of Nodules, Child-Pugh Status, Margin Positivity, and Microvascular Invasion, but not Tumor Size, are Prognostic Factors of Survival after Liver Resection for Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Influence of surgical margin width on survival rate after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[The Pathological Feature of Primary Hepatic Carcinoma on Explanted Liver and Its Significance].

Residual biliary intraepithelial neoplasia without malignant transformation at resection margin for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma does not require expanded resection: a dual center retrospective study

Liver Transplantation for Intrahepatic and Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Future.

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Preoperative Clinical Data and Conventional MRI Characteristics Have Value for the Prediction of Microvascular Invasion and Clinical Significance?