Meteorological Normalization or Deweathering for Predicting Air Pollutant Concentration: Pitfalls and Limitations

Valentino Petrić,Mario Lovrić,Bernhard C. Geiger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-sw2cm-v2

2024-10-21

Abstract:Meteorological normalization is a key concept in studying anthropogenic effects on air pollutant concentrations and its temporal trends. While apparently successful in revealing anthropogenic effects and often used, there are downsides to the methods and limitations which should be taken into account when using it. This study examines the concept of meteorological normalization in the context of predicting air pollutant concentrations, particularly focusing on the method's theoretical background and implicit assumptions. We provide a rigorous analysis that outlines the conditions under which meteorological normalization can effectively estimate expected values of response variables, which are commonly time series of air pollutant concentrations such as PM$_{10}$ . Through our analysis, we identify critical assumptions, such as the independence of meteorological and non-meteorological variables, which can significantly impact the validity of the method's outcomes. We also explore potential failure modes of meteorological normalization when these assumptions are violated, offering practical examples and visualizations that highlight the limitations of this technique. Our findings suggest that while meteorological normalization can be a useful tool, careful consideration of its applicability is necessary to avoid misleading conclusions in air quality assessments.

Chemistry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the pitfalls and limitations of meteorological normalization (or de-weathering) in predicting air pollutant concentrations. Specifically, through rigorous analysis, the paper explores the theoretical background and implicit assumptions of meteorological normalization and points out situations where the method may fail if these assumptions do not hold.

### Main Issues Include:
1. **Implicit Assumptions**: Meteorological normalization methods rely on some key assumptions, such as the independence between meteorological variables and non-meteorological variables. If these assumptions do not hold, meteorological normalization may produce misleading results.
2. **Method Limitations**: Through theoretical analysis and experimental validation, the paper demonstrates that meteorological normalization may fail in certain situations, especially when there is a correlation between meteorological and non-meteorological variables.
3. **Challenges in Practical Applications**: The paper discusses the limitations of meteorological normalization in practical applications, particularly in extrapolation and prediction scenarios where the model may not handle unseen data combinations well.

### Main Contributions of the Paper:
- **Theoretical Analysis**: Provides the mathematical foundation of meteorological normalization methods, clarifying the conditions for their effectiveness.
- **Experimental Validation**: Through specific experiments, it shows the performance of meteorological normalization under different assumptions, especially the failure modes when the assumptions do not hold.
- **Application Recommendations**: Highlights issues to be aware of when using meteorological normalization methods and suggests cautious use of the method in specific situations.

Overall, the paper aims to enhance researchers' and practitioners' understanding of meteorological normalization methods, avoiding the use of these methods in inappropriate situations, thereby preventing erroneous conclusions.