Unravelling the Different Pathways of Cyclohexene Oxidation Via a Peroxyl Radical Generated from Tert-Butyl Hydroperoxide (TBHP) by Various Metal Salts

Lu-Jian Zhou,Xiao-Hui Liu,Han-Wen Zhang,Can Xue,Han-Kang Zhong,Xian-Tai Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qo01681e
IF: 5.456
2024-01-01
Organic Chemistry Frontiers
Abstract:Selective oxidation of cyclohexene is rather challenging due to its two bond reactive centers: allylic C-H and C 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 11111111 00000000 11111111 00000000 00000000 00000000 C. It is of great significance to achieve highly selective oxidation towards the two reactive centers by regulating the catalytic system. Herein, the selective oxidation towards the allylic C-H and CC bond reactive sites of cyclohexene was achieved by using CuCl2 and VCl3 as the catalyst, respectively, in the presence of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP). The CuCl2-catalyzed oxidation of cyclohexene mainly yielded oxidation products at the allylic position, while the VCl3-catalyzed oxidation of cyclohexene mainly yielded epoxidation products at the CC bond. The two different reaction mechanisms are mainly due to the different roles of the t-BuOO center dot radical in the respective catalytic systems. Electron paramagnetic resonance characterizations showed that the amount of t-BuOO center dot radicals in the CuCl2 catalytic system is much lower than that in the VCl3 system. The two different mechanisms were proposed by the means of 18O2 experiments, KIE kinetics and EPR. These mechanisms revealed that the CuCl2 catalyst could rapidly generate the t-BuOO center dot radical, which undergoes bimolecular decay to produce O2. The oxygen then combines with the allyl radical of cyclohexene to produce the oxidized product at the allylic reactive center. In contrast, the VCl3 catalyst promoted the generation of the t-BuOO center dot radical, which reacted with the CC bond of cyclohexene to directly yield the epoxide.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?