On the accuracy of turbulence models for CFD simulations of vertical axis wind turbines
Abdolrahim Rezaeiha,Hamid Montazeri,Bert Blocken
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.053
IF: 9
2019-08-01
Energy
Abstract:<p>A comparative analysis of seven commonly-used eddy-viscosity turbulence models for CFD simulations of VAWTs is presented. The models include one- to four-equations, namely the Spalart-Allmaras (SA), RNG <em>k-ε</em>, realizable <em>k-ε</em>, SST <em>k-ω</em>, SST <em>k-ω</em> with an additional intermittency transition model (SSTI), <em>k-k</em><sub><em>l</em></sub><em>-ω</em> and transition SST (TSST) <em>k-ω</em> models. In addition, the inviscid modeling is included in the comparison. The evaluation is based on validation with three sets of experiments for three VAWTs with different geometrical characteristics operating in a wide range of operational conditions, from dynamic stall to optimal regime and to highly-rotational flow regime. The focus is on the turbine wake, the turbine power performance, and the blade aerodynamics. High-fidelity incompressible unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulations are employed. The extensive analysis reveals high sensitivity of the simulation results to the turbulence model. This is especially the case for the turbine power coefficient <em>C</em><sub><em>P</em></sub>. The results show that the inviscid, SA, RNG <em>k-ε</em>, realizable <em>k-ε</em> and <em>k-k</em><sub><em>l</em></sub><em>-ω</em> models clearly fail in reproducing the aerodynamic performance of VAWTs. Only the SST model variants (SST <em>k-ω,</em> SSTI and TSST) are capable of exhibiting reasonable agreement with all the experimental data sets, where the transitional SST <em>k-ω</em> versions (SSTI and TSST) are recommended as the models of choice especially in the transitional flow regime.</p>
energy & fuels,thermodynamics