Abstract:The article reveals the position and actions of Japan and South Korea regarding the Russian-Ukrainian war after February 24, 2022. Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 prompted mostly symbolic sanctions from Japan and did not distract Tokyo from its aspiration to improve relations with Moscow. However, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has caused tension in relations between Tokyo and Moscow. Japan is the center of support for Ukraine in the Asia-Pacific region, which is extremely important for our country, since this state belongs to the G7 and is one of the leading economies in the world. In contrast, South Korea’s reaction was mixed. When the war broke out, Seoul’s response was vague and mixed, prompting a wave of international criticism that the government did not seem to understand or know how to respond to. The first response of the administration of South Korean President Moon Jae-in was fear for South Korean exports to Russia. For several days, it was unclear whether Seoul would support the sanctions regime. South Korea took action only when the US began threatening trade exclusions on goods needed by exporters. Today, in the Asian context, South Korea and Japan are among the few countries that have provided the most comprehensive support to Ukraine and its partners after February 24, 2022. The Republic of Korea and Japan condemned Russia, imposed sanctions against Moscow, and provided Kyiv with aid and non-lethal military equipment. In addition, South Korea also transferred weapons to Ukraine to repel a Russian invasion, even if these transfers were made through third parties. South Korea and Japan’s pro-Ukrainian position and consequent anti-Russian stance is a result of their strong alliance with the United States and growing security ties with other Western countries, their need to prevent North Korea and China from contemplating similar actions, and their desire to inform that similar events in the region would be undesirable.

Active Non-Alignment, the Sovereignty Paradox and the Russia-Ukraine War

Active Non-alignment and Global Governance from Latin America to the Global South

Active Non-alignment and Global Governance

The Russia–Ukraine war and inter-state dynamics in the Indo-Pacific

Security governance after the war in Ukraine

Bound to Interpret: Russia, NATO, and the Military-Political Crises in the Post-Cold War Order

National interests as the basis for “revisionism” on the international arena in the context of National Security Strategies of Ukraine, United States, and Russia

The Russia–Ukraine conflict and the changing geopolitical landscape in the Middle East

Explaining China’s reaction to the Russia–Ukraine crisis

Ontological Aspects of the russia-Ukraine War

The strategy of “mılıtary non-alıgnment” and NATO

The Impact of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine on East Asia

In Between Deterring and Threatening War: Russia-NATO Strategic Interaction

An analytical study of Russia-Ukraine war in reference to the offensive realist approach in international relations

Unified in response to rising powers? China, Russia and EU-US relations

Russia’s Policies in the Post-Soviet Space: Between Constructive Relations and Fighting the New Cold War

The Middle East and the Ukraine War: Between Fear and Opportunity

Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine and China–North Korea Relations

Russia-Ukraine conflict: An analysis of geopolitical alignments in Asian countries

THE EUROPEAN MIRROR OF HYBRID WAR: HOW RUSSIA TRIES TO DESTABILIZE THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

The Position of Japan and South Korea Regarding the Russian-Ukrainian War