Reflexivity in Teaching Interculturality in China: an Autoethnography of a Teacher’s Multifaceted Transformations

Huiyu Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00919-1
2024-01-01
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Abstract:Standard approaches to studying intercultural communication empirically include pedagogical interventions, interview-based studies, and questionnaire research on teachers’ and students’ experiences with intercultural communication. Such studies assume standard positivist or post-positivist epistemologies and research methods. The present article takes a different, more personal and emic approach to understanding intercultural communication. I conducted an autoethnographic inquiry regarding my 20 years of teaching interculturality in the context of Chinese higher education. Autoethnography provides space to be reflexive on one’s own being(s) and becoming(s) as a teacher-researcher over time. It also facilitates accounting for my gradual but nonlinear transformation from understanding intercultural communication from a traditional (intercultural competence-oriented, ideologies of culturalism, differentialism, and essentialism) perspective to one influenced by postmodernist critical theory. However, my autoethnography is not only about myself because, as an intercultural communication teacher-researcher in a Chinese university, I am a member of a community of such researchers. My story therefore inevitably reflects the shared experience of my community as well as my personal, and to some degree of course idiosyncratic, experience.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?