China ARCHES: A Phase 3 Trial of Enzalutamide Vs Placebo in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Yuan Chang,Yonghong Li,Gongqian Zeng,Hongqian Guo,Zhiquan Hu,Xiaoping Zhang,Dalin He,Zhisong He,Dahong Zhang,Haishan Kadeerbai,Yuning Liu,Fangjian Zhou,Dingwei Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000198
2024-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide vs placebo, both combined with androgen deprivation therapy, in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo, both in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. The primary trial end point was the time to prostate-specific antigen progression. Selected secondary end points included radiographic progression-free survival, time to castration resistance, time to initiation of new antineoplastic therapy, undetectable prostate-specific antigen (<0.2 ng/mL) rate among patients with detectable levels at baseline, and safety. Results: From September 11, 2019, to November 18, 2022, 180 patients were randomized to treatment (enzalutamide: n = 120; placebo: n = 60). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment arms. Median treatment duration in the enzalutamide vs the placebo arm was 25.66 vs 15.11 months. After 63 prostate-specific antigen progression events (enzalutamide: n = 23; placebo: n = 40), enzalutamide significantly reduced the hazard for prostate-specific antigen progression by 87% (hazard ratio: 0.130; 95% confidence interval: 0.076, 0.222; P < .0001) vs placebo. Radiographic progression-free survival, time to castration resistance, and achievement of undetectable prostate-specific antigen levels were increased with enzalutamide vs placebo, while treatment-emergent adverse event rates were similar. Serious and grade 3 to 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 35.3% and 52.1%, respectively, of enzalutamide recipients vs 20.3% and 39.0%, respectively, of placebo recipients. Conclusions: In Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, enzalutamide significantly reduced the hazard for prostate-specific antigen progression vs placebo when combined with androgen deprivation therapy. The China ARCHES (NCT04076059) results were consistent with those of the global ARCHES study (NCT02677896).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?