Abstract:This article establishes a tri‐level decision‐making model supporting critical infrastructure (CI) resilience optimization against intentional attacks. A novel decomposition algorithm is proposed to exactly identify the best pre‐event defense strategy (protecting vulnerable components and building new lines), the worst‐case attack scenario, and the optimal postevent repair sequence of damaged components. As different types of CIs have different flow models, this article mainly considers the direct current power flow model and the maximal flow model for illustrative purposes. The proposed framework is illustrated by a simple but representative case system with nine nodes, and main results include: (1) the marginal value of extra defense investment under low defense budget is more considerable for mitigating system resilience loss, especially under large intentional attacks; (2) no defense strategy is always the best under different attack budgets; (3) increasing amount of repair resources can dramatically enhance CI resilience, but makes the pre‐event defense strategy less effective; (4) the use of maximal flow model can provide a lower bound estimation of the resilience loss from the power flow model; (5) the optimum defense strategy and the worst‐case attack identified by minimizing CI resilience loss largely differ from those by minimizing CI vulnerability, where the latter does not consider the recovery actions. Finally, the algorithm complexity is analyzed by comparing with the enumeration method and by testing two larger electric power systems.

Optimal Defense Resource Allocation Considering Nonlinear Attack Cost in Power Systems

Optimal Defense Resources Allocation for Power System Based on Bounded Rationality Game Theory Analysis

Defense Optimization in Power Systems against False Data Injection Attacks

Optimal budget deployment strategy against power grid interdiction

Load Redistribution Attack in Optimal Power Flow with Phase Shifting Transformers

Attack-defense Differential Game to Strength Allocation Strategies Generation

A Resource Allocation Method for Attacks on Power Systems under Extreme Weather

Robust Substation Enhancement Strategy for Allocating the Defensive Resource Against the Cyber-Attacks on IEDs

Risk Assessment and Defense Resource Allocation of Cyber-Physical Distribution Systems under Denial-of-Service Attacks

Exploring the Optimum Proactive Defense Strategy for the Power Systems from an Attack Perspective.

Optimal resource allocation for defending -out-of- systems against sequential intentional and unintentional impacts.

Defending a Parallel System Against a Strategic Attacker with Redundancy, Protection and Disinformation.

A Tri‐level Optimization Model for Power Systems Defense Considering Cyber‐physical Interdependence

Research on Optimal Allocation of Protective Resources of Power Network under Malicious Attacks

A Defense Planning Model for a Power System Against Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attack

Attack–Defense Confrontation Analysis and Optimal Defense Strategy Selection Using Hybrid Game Theoretic Methods

A quantified multi-stage optimization method for resource allocation of electric grid defense planning

A Mathematical Framework to Optimize Critical Infrastructure Resilience Against Intentional Attacks

Optimal resource allocation for defending k-out-of-n systems against sequential intentional and unintentional impacts

Robust Allocation Of Hardening Resources Against Load Redistribution Attacks In Smart Grids

Game-Theoretic Model for Optimal Cyber-Attack Defensive Decision-Making in Cyber-Physical Power Systems