Solid-state-NMR validation of OPLS4: Structure of PC-lipid bilayers and its modulation by dehydration

Markus S. Miettinen,Milla Kurki,Alexey Nesterenko,Nicolai Alsaker,Tiago Ferreira,Sami Kyllönen,Antti Poso,Piia Bartos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-fhwqk
2024-10-08
Abstract:Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are a much-used tool for investigating the structure and dynamics in biomembranes with atomic resolution. The validity of the representations obtained is determined by the accuracy and realism of the MD model (force field). Here, we evaluated the proprietary OPLS4 force field of Schrödinger, Inc. against atomic-resolution experimental data and compared its performance to CHARMM36, one of the best-performing openly available force fields. As benchmark, we used high-resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) order parameters for C–H bonds—directly and reliably calculable from MD simulations—measured in phosphatidylcholine (PC) lipid bilayers under varying hydra- tion conditions. Comparisons were made with two dehydration datasets: for saturated (1,2- dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine DMPC) lipid bilayers from the literature, and for unsaturated (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine POPC) lipid bilayers measured here. Our findings indicate that OPLS4 reproduces the structure and dehydration-response of PC-lipid bilayers fairly well, even slightly outperforming CHARMM36. Both models’ main inaccuracies appear in (1) the order parameter magnitudes in the glycerol backbone and unsaturated carbon segments, and (2) the qualitatively differing structural response of the PC-headgroup to dehydration compared to experiments. In summary, the presented work underscores the importance of independent validation for (proprietary) force fields and highlights the strik- ing similarities and nuanced differences between OPLS4 and CHARMM36 in describing biomembranes.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the performance of the OPLS4 force field in simulating the phosphatidylcholine (PC) lipid bilayer structure and its dehydration response, and to compare it with the widely - used CHARMM36 force field. Specifically, the researchers use high - resolution solid - state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data as a benchmark to verify the performance of these two force fields under different water conditions, especially under dehydration conditions. ### Main problems 1. **Evaluating the accuracy of the OPLS4 force field**: - The researchers hope to verify whether the OPLS4 force field can accurately reproduce the structure and dehydration response of the PC lipid bilayer. - Evaluate the performance of the OPLS4 force field by comparing it with experimental data (especially NMR data). 2. **Comparison with the CHARMM36 force field**: - Compare the performance of the OPLS4 force field with that of the CHARMM36 force field in detail to determine which force field is more accurate in describing the PC lipid bilayer. - Pay special attention to the performance of the two force fields in describing the C - H bond order parameters (SCH) of the lipid head group, glycerol backbone and tail segment. ### Specific objectives - **Verify the OPLS4 force field**: Use high - resolution NMR data to verify the accuracy of the OPLS4 force field in simulating the PC lipid bilayer structure and dehydration response. - **Compare the two force fields**: Through detailed comparison, reveal the similarities and differences between the OPLS4 and CHARMM36 force fields in describing the PC lipid bilayer. - **Evaluate the dehydration response**: Pay special attention to the ability of the two force fields to describe the structural changes of the PC lipid bilayer under dehydration conditions. ### Methods - **Molecular dynamics simulation**: Use the OPLS4 and CHARMM36 force fields to conduct molecular dynamics simulations of the PC lipid bilayer under different water conditions. - **NMR experiment**: Measure the C - H bond order parameters (SCH) under different water conditions through solid - state NMR experiments as a benchmark for verifying the simulation results. - **Data analysis**: Calculate the C - H bond order parameters (SCH) in the simulation trajectory and compare them with the experimental data to evaluate the accuracy of the force field. ### Results - **Performance of the OPLS4 force field**: The OPLS4 force field performs well in simulating the PC lipid bilayer structure and dehydration response, and is even slightly better than the CHARMM36 force field in some aspects. - **Main inaccuracies**: The main inaccuracies of the two force fields occur in the order parameter amplitudes of the glycerol backbone and unsaturated carbon segments, as well as the qualitative differences between the structural responses of the PC head group to dehydration and the experimental results. - **Dehydration response**: The two force fields show similar trends in describing the structural changes of the PC lipid bilayer under dehydration conditions, but there are differences in some details. ### Conclusions - This study emphasizes the importance of independent verification (especially for commercial force fields) and reveals the significant similarities and subtle differences between the OPLS4 and CHARMM36 force fields in describing biological membranes.